Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Which criteria do experts consider as most important to evaluate quality in science communication online? We conducted a Delphi study to examine their opinions. The study encompassed two waves of surveys with 26 (wave 1) and 19 (wave 2) science communciation scholars from across the world and resulted in 12 quality criteria for online science communication.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 39 | |
| downloads | 27 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts