Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Introduction A fingerprint offers a convenient, non-invasive sampling matrix for monitoring therapeutic drug use. Despite a multitude of potential applications, uptake of fingerprint drug testing has been stunted by the inability to determine, or control for, sample volume. The collection of reproducible fingerprints is highly challenging, where factors such as contact time, pressure and time of collection can influence the amount and composition of material collected. Here we demonstrate that internal metabolite markers in a fingerprint can be used to show that sufficient sample has been collected, and can reduce intra-donor variability. Methods Fingerprint samples (n=140) were collected from patients receiving the antibiotic isoniazid as part of their treatment, as well as from a drug-naive control group (n=50). The fingerprint samples were analysed for isoniazid (INH) and acetlyisoniaizid (AcINH), using liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The dataset was analysed retrospectively for metabolites known to be present in eccrine sweat. Results INH or AcINH were detected in 89 % of the fingerprints collected from patients, and in 0 % of the control group. The metabolites lysine, ornithine, pyroglutamic acid and taurine were concurrently detected alongside INH/AcINH and were used to determine whether the fingerprint sample was sufficient for testing. Given sufficient sample volume, the fingerprint test for isoniazid use has sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%. Normalisation to taurine was found to reduce intra-donor variability. Conclusion Fingerprints are a novel and non-invasive approach to medical adherence monitoring. Endogenous metabolites can be used as internal markers to demonstrate sufficient sample volume for fingerprint based testing and reduce intra-donor variability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts