Views provided by UsageCounts
Image Acquisition protocol ‘compressedFISH ROBOFISH job.ipynb’ Image Processing - Cell segmentation and compressed sensing pipeline ‘’imagedata.py” “ImageAnalysis_testing.ipynb” extra files for imagedata.py to work: stitcher.py Output files: polygons.pkl map_from_centroid_to_average.pkl average_intensities.pkl Other attachments in Zenodo: Exp name ‘16-gene’ pilot exp ‘167-gene’ exp at 40X and 60X ‘167-gene’ exp at 20X Amplifiers used CompositeAmplifiers.xlsx Genes targeted codebook_composite_test_High.xlsx 167genes_MouseBrain.xlsx MouseGeneSelection.txt Exp logs ROBOFISH log FLEXP2022-02-08 amplifier test.txt ROBOFISH log FLEXP2022-02-17.txt ROBOFISH log FLEXP2022-04-22.txt ROBOFISH log FLEXP2022-04-15.txt Table 2. List of each experiment’s respective attachments, as stored in Zenodo.
compressed_sensing, compressedFISH, composite, smFISH
compressed_sensing, compressedFISH, composite, smFISH
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts