Views provided by UsageCounts
[For the latest version of this repository go to: https://gitlab.utwente.nl/fmt/fault-trees/ft-moea.git] We present a novel approach to automatically infer Fault Tree (FT) models from a failure data set via multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), where the main contributions are that (i) we show it is possible to achieve more consistent and efficient FT structures via MOEAs, which simultaneously minimize the fault tree size, the error computed based on the failure data set, and the error based on Minimal Cut Sets (ii) we propose a metric to compare FT structures via Minimal Cut Sets using the RV-coefficient, (iii) we carry out a parametric analysis that explains the performance of the algorithm under different assumptions. Edition May 17, 2022: We add some results concerning the parametric analysis we carried out to evaluate the effects of noise on the FT inference process.
This research has been partially funded by Dutch Research Council (NWO) under the grant PrimaVera (https://primavera-project.com) number NWA.1160.18.238.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Complex systems, Data Science, Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing, parametric analysis., Model learning, Parametric analysis, Evolutionary algorithms, Fault tree analysis, Multi-objective optimization, multi-objective optimization, model learning, 2023 OA procedure, Software Science, and Infrastructure, Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE), evolutionary algorithms, Innovation, complex systems, SDG 9 - Industry
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Complex systems, Data Science, Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing, parametric analysis., Model learning, Parametric analysis, Evolutionary algorithms, Fault tree analysis, Multi-objective optimization, multi-objective optimization, model learning, 2023 OA procedure, Software Science, and Infrastructure, Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE), evolutionary algorithms, Innovation, complex systems, SDG 9 - Industry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts