Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The logarithms of John Napier (1614) and Henry Briggs (1617) were landmarks in the history of mathematics, and their work is well known to math historians, but not so much to mathematicians who learn calculus from modern texts. This is odd because so many of the basic ideas of analysis are directly related to arithmetic techniques and concepts they employed or anticipated without calculus, and they can all be explained in algebraic terms with limiting values that are evident from calculus. This study explores the underlying mathematics of Napier and Briggs in a manner that underscores modern concepts inherent in their work. Codes written in a Basic-like language are provided to demonstrate the calculations using Casio's online Keisan Calculator.
John Napier, Henry Briggs, natural logarithms, base-10 logarithms, Bernoulli numbers, early analysis, John Napier, Henry Briggs, Napier's logarithm, natural logarithms, base-10 logarithms, Bernoulli numbers, early analysis, https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2020.html?t=&s=01a45&btn=Search&ls=s, https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2020.html?t=01A45&s=65-03&btn=Search&ls=Ct, https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2020.html?t=65-03&s=65-04&btn=Search&ls=Ct
John Napier, Henry Briggs, natural logarithms, base-10 logarithms, Bernoulli numbers, early analysis, John Napier, Henry Briggs, Napier's logarithm, natural logarithms, base-10 logarithms, Bernoulli numbers, early analysis, https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2020.html?t=&s=01a45&btn=Search&ls=s, https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2020.html?t=01A45&s=65-03&btn=Search&ls=Ct, https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2020.html?t=65-03&s=65-04&btn=Search&ls=Ct
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 28 | |
| downloads | 36 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts