Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Otacilia xueshanensis Mu & Jin & Zhang 2022, sp. nov.

Authors: Mu, Yannan; Jin, Chi; Zhang, Feng;

Otacilia xueshanensis Mu & Jin & Zhang 2022, sp. nov.

Abstract

Otacilia xueshanensis sp. nov. (Ḣ山Þffifl) Figs 10G–H, 17, 18 Type material. Holotype ♂: CHINA: Guizhou Province: Bijie City, Weining Yi and Hui and Miao Autonomous County, Xueshan Town, Xueshan Reservoir (27°03.90′N, 104°06.34′E, 2423 m elev.), 19Aug. 2017, leg. Yannan Mu. Paratypes: 2♀, same data as holotype. Etymology. The species name is derived from the type locality; adjective. Diagnosis. This new species resembles O. submicrostoma Jin, Fu, Yin & Zhang, 2016 by having a similarly shaped FA, transverse and slender embolus, and similar bulb (see Fig. 17A, C and fig. 11A, C in Jin et al. 2016), but males can be distinguished by the thin RTA and a small and obvious apophysis present at the prolateral base of the RTA (vs wide RTA without basal apophysis, compare Figs 17B–D, 18B–D and figs 11D, 12C in Jin et al. 2016). Females can be distinguished by the thin median septum (vs without median septum, compare Fig. 18E with fig. 12D in Jin et al. 2016) and the compact, closely situated copulatory openings, copulatory ducts and connecting tube (vs loose and clearly separated, compare Fig. 17E–F and fig. 11E–G in Jin et al. 2016). Description. Male: holotype (Fig. 10G): total length 2.81, carapace 1.51 long, 1.32 wide (CW); abdomen 1.31 long, 0. 89 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.09, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09; AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE 0.01, ALE–ALE 0.22, PME–PME 0.13, PME–PLE 0.07, PLE–PLE 0.38, ALE–PLE 0.10. Eye area 0.51 wide (EAW), cephalic region 0.71 wide (CRW), EAW/CRW 0.72. CRW/CW 0.54. MOA 0.22 long, anterior width 0.20, posterior width 0.27. Clypeal height 0.15 (CH), CH /AME 1.67. Chelicerae with three promarginal and six retromarginal teeth. Carapace yellow, with broad black ring around margin of carapace. Abdomen oval, gray, with large rectangular dorsal scutum anteriorly, two irregular black spots at middle area, one black chevron marking and three transverse stripes posteriorly (Fig. 10G). Palp as in Figs 17A–D, 18A–D. FA high, located at anterior of femur. PTA sclerotized, tip round (Figs 17A, 18A). RTA thin, long and straight, with small apophysis prolaterally at base of RTA (Figs 17B, 18B). Tegulum oval, wider than cymbium. Tegulum apophysis large, triangular. Sperm duct tapering to embolus. Embolus slender, transverse. Conductor absent. Female (Fig. 10H): total length 3.95–4.24 (n=2). One paratype total length 3.95, carapace 1.64 long, 1.49 wide (CW); abdomen 2.31 long, 1.57 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.11, ALE 0.10, PME 0.09, PLE 0.11; AME – AME 0.03, AME – ALE 0.01, ALE – ALE 0.24, PME – PME 0.11, PME – PLE 0.05, PLE – PLE 0.40, ALE – PLE 0.10. Eye area 0.53 wide (EAW), cephalic region 0.77 wide (CRW), EAW/CRW 0.69. CRW/CW 0.52. MOA 0.26 long, anterior width 0.22, posterior width 0.30. Clypeal height 0.13 (CH), CH / AME 1.18. Carapace dark brown, with broad black ring around margin of carapace, and hand-shaped brown pattern at middle part around fovea. Abdomen gray, without dorsal scutum, anterior black, two triangular black spots at middle area, four chevron stripes posteriorly (Fig. 10H). Epigyne as in Figs 17E–F, 18E–F. Epigynal plate longer than wide. Median septum extremely thin, crack-like. Copulatory openings small, with wing-shaped copulatory plug (Figs 17E). Copulatory ducts short and thick, close to each other and slightly separated at posterior part. Connecting tube thin, strongly curved. Bursa oval, transparent. Spermathecae oval, transverse, close to each other. Fertilization ducts located at anterior of spermathecae. Measurements of legs: Distribution. China (Guizhou Province).

Published as part of Mu, Yannan, Jin, Chi & Zhang, Feng, 2022, Description of eight new species of Otacilia Thorell, 1897 from southern China (Araneae: Phrurolithidae), pp. 238-260 in Zootaxa 5134 (2) on pages 258-260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5134.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6534883

Related Organizations
Keywords

Otacilia, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Phrurolithidae, Otacilia xueshanensis, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 1
  • 1
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
1
Green