Rebuttal letter to the review of "Coverage of open citations in DOAJ journals (Protocol)"

{"references": ["Chiara Catizone. (2022). Review of: \"Coverage of open citations in DOAJ journals v1\". Qeios. doi:10.32388/IDM7UP.", "Constance Dami, Alessandro Bertozzi, Chiara Manca, Umut Kucuk 2022. Coverage of open citations in DOAJ journals. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.n92ldz598v5b/v2 Version created by Alessandro Bertozzi", "Constance Dami, Alessandro Bertozzi, Chiara Manca, Umut Kucuk 2022. Coverage of open citations in DOAJ journals - Protocol. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.n92ldz598v5b/v3 Version created by Chiara Manca"]}

This document is a rebuttal letter addressing th review of Chiara Catizone: Chiara Catizone. (2022). Review of: "Coverage of open citations in DOAJ journals v1". Qeios. doi:10.32388/IDM7UP. about the first version of the protocol of our research on the Coverage of open citations in DOAJ journals and its consequent new version. It was made in the context of the Open Science course by S. Peroni at the University of Bologna 2021-22.

Related Organizations

Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna
Italy

Keywords

rebuttal letter, Open Science, protocol

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average