Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This article attempts a creative extension of S. Bodrunov’s concept of noonomy through drawing in the most important ideas of A. Honneth and J. Habermas, third and second-generation leaders respectively of the Frankfurt school. The purpose of this theoretical synthesis is to supplement Bodrunov’s theory, which provides a detailed account of the changes to the productive system and which from them, deduces profound transformations in other areas of public life. The article sets out to do this through social and philosophical elaborations that primarily analyse changes in the normative and institutional setting (A. Honneth) and in the political field (J. Habermas). Although S. Bodrunov also recognises and analyses these changes, approaches that proceed from other bases in defining the future social structure are nevertheless able to complement this analysis.
noonomics, socialization of society, moral self-restraint, mutual recognition, solidarity, freedom, democratic law
noonomics, socialization of society, moral self-restraint, mutual recognition, solidarity, freedom, democratic law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts