Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

How green is my Valley? Measuring open access friendliness of Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) through data carpentry

Authors: Mukhopadhyay, Parthasarathi;

How green is my Valley? Measuring open access friendliness of Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) through data carpentry

Abstract

This research study aims to develop a distributed weightage based ranking framework for measuring Open Access (OA) support/friendliness (Open Access Friendliness Indicator – OAFI) of a given Indian institute. It applies data carpentry tools and methods for gathering and extracting OA data from an array of diverse sources available against ODbL. The ranking framework has four primary areas (OA publications share, OA license share, OA citations share and OA altmetric share) and a total of ten factors under these selected areas. The distributions of weightage have been set on the basis of SWOC analysis of open access scenario in India and the product is a 100-point scale for measuring OA friendliness of a given institute. The framework has been tested with the publications data (1,59,107), citations data (21,69,395), and altmetric data (24,308) of the top Indian Institutes of Technology (16 IITs) that are listed in the top 100 of the overall category of the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), 2020. The final ranked list of the selected 16 IITs shows that in general older IITs are much ahead in terms of numbers (publications, citations, altmetric) but newer IITs are tenanted all top five positions in OAFI framework as factor formulae are ratio dependent. It also shows that Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (established in 2008) occupied the top most position with leading scores in area I (OA publications share) and area III (OA citations share) and Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswarhas obtained the highest value in area II – OA license share, and Indian Institute of Technology Ropar has topped the list in area IV – OA altmetric score share.

Related Organizations
Keywords

https://lccn.loc.gov/sh2007006260, Library carpentry, Informetrics, Open access friendliness, OAFI ranking framework, Open access, https://lccn.loc.gov/n88005993, Data carpentry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 73
    download downloads 66
  • 73
    views
    66
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
73
66
Green