Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this paper, we discuss FAIR Data, why it exists, and who it applies to. We further review the principles of FAIR data and how they are managed in research centers. We also discuss the types of problems that researchers encounter, and what an information professional can do to assist them. At present, the vast majority of centers subscribe to the FAIR principles. However, both center and researcher face the arduous task of understanding, managing, and implementing the model. They must know data formats and standards. For a correct description and to facilitate data retrieval and interoperability, they must know about different types of metadata schemas. They must know about digital preservation and specific aspects of knowledge and information management. In addition, there are also ethical issues, intellectual property, and cultural differences. All these controversies translate into extra workload for researchers, who only get a return in the form of citations. It is critical to note that these information professionals can play a key role in the proper management of research data, and can help achieve the objectives described in the principles: making data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.
Literature review, Open access publishing, FAIR principles, literature review, FAIR implementation challenges, L, Data research management, fair principles, Education, Research data, FAIR Data, Bobcatsss, FAIR Data, Dades de recerca, research data management, FAIR implementation challenges, Accés obert
Literature review, Open access publishing, FAIR principles, literature review, FAIR implementation challenges, L, Data research management, fair principles, Education, Research data, FAIR Data, Bobcatsss, FAIR Data, Dades de recerca, research data management, FAIR implementation challenges, Accés obert
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 243 | |
| downloads | 221 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts