Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Software . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

giactitti/STGEE: STGEE v1.1

Authors: Giacomo Titti; Gabriele Nicola Napoli; Luigi Lombardo;
Abstract

Fifty years of technological advancements have witness drastic changes in the way probabilistic models are run to estimate where natural hazards may likely occur in the future. One element have remained the same through time though. Researchers and professionals in the field 1) collect and download data from a number of open repositories, 2) then load the same in a GIS environment where they pre-process the information and 3) export it in tabular form for it to be 4) externally loaded in a computing environment where data-driven models are built, whose results are exported ones more to be 5) loaded back in a GIS to visualize them in a map. Unfortunately, today this is still the most common practice, which in turn implies a lengthy process involving a number of input/output operations that could be removed if a single environment could manage most of them. With this specific reason in mind, we have developed our STGEE tool. Via STGEE, one can simply upload a shapefile of the geographic objects upon which one needs to calculate the probability of natural hazard occurrence (already internally labeled though with a presence/absence field) and then the rest is taken care by the STGEE, relying on the breadth of environmental properties available in Google Earth Engine as well as the machine learning tools already implemented there. STGEE, then loads the data, find a series of predictors already hosted in the cloud, trains (in this current version) a Random Forest classifier to estimate the susceptibility. A number of interactive visualization tools are there to explore the goodness-of-fit as well as the predictive power of the model at hand. The latter can be evaluated via spatial cross-validation routines whose spatial structure can be arbitrarily chosen, modifying a few parameters in the source code.

Keywords

Susceptibility, Natural hazards, Google Earth Engine, Random forest

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 8
    download downloads 2
  • 8
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
8
2