Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparing Performance of IPv6 multicast and unicast for software updates

Authors: Calvelli, Claudio; Payne, Esther; Sheffield, Brett Andrew Coates;

Comparing Performance of IPv6 multicast and unicast for software updates

Abstract

All software has bugs. All connected devices require software updates to be secure – everything from the largest server infrastructure to the smallest IoT device. The network component of a software update is a data transfer. A file or files need to be distributed from a central point to potentially billions of nodes. Presently, in almost all cases, these updates are delivered via unicast. By devices, we do not just mean IoT but the entire infrastructure internet. Routers, VOIP, mobile phones, consumer devices. A device that is connected to a network will at some point require updates. The experiment aimed to show a marked improvement over unicast for this use case so that the application of multicast for other (non-streaming) will become clear. Librecast aimed to show the fundamental difference in thinking between unicast and multicast. Specifically, in comparison to unicast, multicast; * uses less bandwidth * requires less infrastructure * has a lower power consumption * has a lower carbon footprint * can lower financial costs, both capital and operating costs * can make better use of on-demand (cloud) infrastructure * has privacy improvements over unicast The network component of a software update is a data transfer. A file or files need to be distributed from a central point to potentially billions of nodes. Presently, in almost all cases, these updates are delivered via unicast. By devices, we do not just mean IoT but the entire infrastructure of the internet. Routers, VOIP, mobile phones, consumer devices. Everything that is connected to a network will need updates. If we can show a marked improvement over unicast for this simple and universal use case, utilization of multicast for other (non-streaming) cases becomes much clearer. Librecast aims to show the fundamental difference in thinking between unicast and multicast.

Keywords

unicast, fed4fire, IoT Updates, IoT, IPv6, multicast, mldv2

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 577
    download downloads 22
  • 577
    views
    22
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
577
22