Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Our team’s (CERTH ITI M4D) goal in the TREC Deep Learning Track was to study how the Con- textualized Embedding Query Expansion (CEQE) [1] method performs in such setting and how our proposed modifications affect the performance. In particular, we examine how CEQE performs with the addition of bigrams as potential expansion terms, and how an IDF weight component affects the performance. The first run we submitted is produced by a query expansion pipeline that uses BM25 for retrieval and CEQE with the IDF modification for query expansion. The second submitted run used a modification of CEQE with the addition of bigrams as candidate expansion terms and a re-ranking step using CEDR. Our runs showed promising results, especially for Average Precision.
TREC Deep Learning, IDF, Query Expansion, BERT
TREC Deep Learning, IDF, Query Expansion, BERT
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 22 | |
| downloads | 14 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts