Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Netzeliidae KOSAKYAN ET AL. 2016

Authors: González-Miguéns, Rubén; Soler-Zamora, Carmen; Villar-Depablo, Mar; Todorov, Milcho; Lara, Enrique;

Netzeliidae KOSAKYAN ET AL. 2016

Abstract

FAMILY NETZELIIDAE KOSAKYAN ET AL., 2016 Type species: Netzelia oviformis (Cash, 1909). Updated diagnosis: Globular or oviform tests, with radial symmetry. Aperture is central, regular or lobed and forms a collar towards the outside of the test. Presence of irregular, ‘nail’-shaped idiosomes or/and exogenous materials, when these are available. Included taxa: (Supporting Information, Appendix S1). Difflugia lobostoma Leidy, 1874 and Difflugia lithophila Penard, 1902 share many traits with members of the genus Netzelia, such as Netzelia achlora (Penard, 1902), Netzelia gramen (Penard, 1902) and Netzelia oviformis (Cash, 1909), placed in the genus Netzelia by Gomaa et al. (2017). The main reason for the similarity between these species was the capacity to build a test with idiosomes independently from the presence of building material (Ogden, 1979). Later works showed that Difflugia lobostoma also had this ability, justifying its inclusion within the genus Netzelia (Medioli et al., 1987). Furthermore, both D. lobostoma and D. lithophila have planktonic life-stages, like many Sphaerothecina. Cucurbitella in turn, has been included into Sphaerothecina (Lahr et al., 2019) based on its round/oval-shaped test and the presence of a collar around the aperture, but classified as incertae sedis. Nevertheless, this genus shares with the genus Netzelia the ability of building a test without incorporating foreign particles (Medioli et al., 1987). Our phylogenetic tree shows (Fig. 1) that D. lithophila, D. lobostoma and Cucurbitella mespiliformis form a clade sister to the familyArcellidae, therefore we include the genus Cucurbitella with the family Netzeliidae and transfer D. lithophila and D. lobostoma to the genus Netzelia (see Supporting Information, Appendix S1). Differential diagnosis between genera: Cucurbitella differs from Netzelia as the development of its collar creates an internal diaphragm, forming a second chamber with a central aperture (Fig. 9).

Published as part of González-Miguéns, Rubén, Soler-Zamora, Carmen, Villar-Depablo, Mar, Todorov, Milcho & Lara, Enrique, 2022, Multiple convergences in the evolutionary history of the testate amoeba family Arcellidae (Amoebozoa: Arcellinida: Sphaerothecina): when the ecology rules the morphology, pp. 1044-1071 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 194 (4) on page 1060, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab074, http://zenodo.org/record/6461266

Keywords

Netzeliidae, Arcellinida, Lobosa, Biodiversity, Protozoa, Amoebozoa, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green