Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The Advancing Data Justice Research and Practice project aims to broaden understanding of the social, historical, cultural, political, and economic forces that contribute to discrimination and inequity in contemporary ecologies of data collection, governance, and use. This is the consultation draft of a guide for developers and organisations, which are producing, procuring, or using data-intensive technologies.In the first section, we introduce the field of data justice, from its early discussions to more recent proposals to relocate understandings of what data justice means. This section includes a description of the six pillars of data justice around which this guidance revolves. Next, to support developers in designing, developing, and deploying responsible and equitable data-intensive and AI/ML systems, we outline the AI/ML project lifecycle through a sociotechnical lens. To support the operationalisation data justice throughout the entirety of the AI/ML lifecycle and within data innovation ecosystems, we then present five overarching principles of responsible, equitable, and trustworthy data research and innovation practices, the SAFE-D principles-Safety, Accountability, Fairness, Explainability, and Data Quality, Integrity, Protection, and Privacy. The final section presents guiding questions that will help developers both address data justice issues throughout the AI/ML lifecycle and engage in reflective innovation practices that ensure the design, development, and deployment of responsible and equitable data-intensive and AI/ML systems.
arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2202.02776
data power, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, knowledge, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, data ethics, Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction, pluriverse, human rights, Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC), Machine Learning (cs.LG), power, Computer Science - Computers and Society, equity, AI ethics, access, Computer Science - Databases, Computers and Society (cs.CY), social justice, participation, data colonialism, digital rights, economic justice, digital infrastructure, design justice, post-development theory, Databases (cs.DB), data justice, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), intercultural ethics, data feminism, intercultural communication, decolonial AI
data power, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, knowledge, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, data ethics, Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction, pluriverse, human rights, Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC), Machine Learning (cs.LG), power, Computer Science - Computers and Society, equity, AI ethics, access, Computer Science - Databases, Computers and Society (cs.CY), social justice, participation, data colonialism, digital rights, economic justice, digital infrastructure, design justice, post-development theory, Databases (cs.DB), data justice, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), intercultural ethics, data feminism, intercultural communication, decolonial AI
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 74 | |
| downloads | 51 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts