Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Doroixys acutirostris Kim & Boxshall 2020, sp. nov.

Authors: Kim, Il-Hoi; Boxshall, Geoff A.;

Doroixys acutirostris Kim & Boxshall 2020, sp. nov.

Abstract

Doroixys acutirostris sp. nov. (Figs. 308, 309) Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21361) and 1 paratype ♀ (dissected andmountedona slide, MNHN-IU-2014-21362) from Cystodytes sp. (MNHN-IT-2008-2621 = MNHNA3/CYS/135), CRRFOCDN 5119- X, the Philippines (09°31.02 Ń, 123°40.83 É), depth 10 m, 15 April 1997. Etymology. The specific name is a combination of Latin words acut (= sharp) and rostr (= a beak), alluding to the acutely pointed rostrum. Descriptionoffemale. Body (Fig. 308A) narrow, 1.27 mm long. Prosome 0.91 mm long. Dorsal cephalic shield bearing pair of slender, spiniform horn-like processes (Fig. 308B) posterolaterally. Metasome with 2 dorsal and lateral constrictions delimiting first, second, and fused third plus fourth pedigerous somites; region of fourth pedigerous somite longer than wide. Free urosome (Fig. 308C) graduallynarrowing posteriorly, 5-segmented: genital and 4 abdominalsomites 44×127, 57×115, 42×97, 40×84, and 52×74 μm, respectively. Abdominal somites ornamented with many scattered surface setules. Caudal ramus (Fig. 308D) about 4.0 timeslongerthan wide (75×19 μm): armed with 6 naked setae, 2 middle and 4 distal; 2 middle setae positioned at 40 and 53% of ramus length; setae small but at least as long as width of ramus at base. Rostrum (Fig. 308E, F) well-developod, hook-like in lateral view (Fig. 308A, E), strongly tapering towards beak-like tip (Fig. 308F). Antennule (Fig. 308G) stout, 117 μmlong, 7-segmented; armatureformula 2, 13, 4, 4, 2, 3, and 12; second segment ornamented with several sensillae; all setae naked; aesthetascs apparently absent. Antenna (Fig. 308H) 4-segmented; proximal 3 segments unarmed; basis shorter than first endopodal segment; compound distal endopodal segment 2.7 times longerthan wide (38×14 μm), ornamented with few minute spinules on outer margin; armed with 5 small setae (arranged as 1, 2, and 2) plus strongly curved, hook-like terminal claw, as long as second endopodal segment. Labrum (Fig. 308I) lacking defined posteromedian lobe, ornamented with fine setules on both sides of posterior margin; dense area of cuticle present posteromedially. Mandible (Fig. 308J) bearing 5 teeth on broad coxal gnathobase, 1 setaon basis, 5 setaeon exopod, and 1 and 6 setae on first and second endopodal segments, respectively; outer seta on exopod about one-third as long as other 4 setae; articulation between endopodal segments incomplete; outer seta on second endopodal segment small; largest mediodistal setaon second endopodal segment about twice as long as second longest seta on segment. Maxillule (Fig. 308K) armedwith 9 setaeon arthrite, 1 on epipodite; 1 on basis; 4 onexopodand 3 on endopod; coxal endite absent. Maxilla (Fig. 309A) 4- segmented; syncoxa with 4, 2, and 2 setae on first to third endites, respectively; basiswith slender, naked clawplus 2 setae (1 largeand 1 minute); endopod 2-segmentedwith 1 and 3 setae on first and second segments, respectively. Maxilliped (Fig. 309B) lobate, armed distally with 1 longer and 5 short setae, ornamented with spinules on outer surface. Legs 1–4 with 3-segmented rami (Fig. 309 C-E). Leg 3 same as leg 2 in armature. Inner coxal seta absent in all swimming legs. Innerdistalspineonbasisofleg 1 small, 13 μm long. All setaeon legs 2–4 naked, most bluntly tipped. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows: CoxaBasisExopodEndopodLeg 10-01-II-1; I-1; 2, 2, 30-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3Legs 2 & 30-01-01-0; 1-0; 3, 1, 50-0; 0-0; 0, 2, 350-0; 0-0; 0, 2, 3Leg 40-01-01-0; 1-0; 2, 1, 50-0; 0-0; 0, 2, 250-0; 0-0; 0, 2, 2 Leg 5 (Fig. 309F) consistingof obscure protopod bearing 1 setaat outer distalcorner and tapering, sclerotized process representing exopod, bearing 1 seta on outer marginand 1 pointed dentiform process at tip. Male. Unknown. Remarks. In Doroixys acutirostris sp. nov. the endopods of legs 2 and 3 are 3-segmented and both are armed with 5 setae on the third segment, and the endopod of leg 4 is 3-segmented and armed with 4 setae on the third segment. This characteristic armature combination serves to differentiate the new species from all of its congeners. The possession of the beak-like rostrum and the distal position of all setae on the maxilliped seem to be additional diagnostic (autapomorphic) features.

Published as part of Kim, Il-Hoi & Boxshall, Geoff A., 2020, Untold diversity: the astonishing species richness of the Notodelphyidae (Copepoda: Cyclopoida), a family of symbiotic copepods associated with ascidians (Tunicata), pp. 1-6 in Megataxa 4 (1) on pages 466-469, DOI: 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4591138

Keywords

Copepoda, Doroixys, Notodelphyidae, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Cyclopoida, Doroixys acutirostris, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3