
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Changes to the statistical architecture of relative binding free energy (RBFE) perturbation maps dramatically improve the accuracy of affinity estimates. In perturbation maps, nodes represent ligands in a lead series of size n, and edges are alchemical transformations. For maximum certainty in predicted potencies, a design would include all edge combinations, or n choose 2 transformations. However, the computational cost to traverse all possible edges becomes prohibitive with increasing n. Experimental designs should therefore allocate resources intelligibly while preserving accuracy. The typical design process, such as that carried out by the open-source tool Lead Optimization Mapper, LOMAP, still relies on heuristic decisions for generating designs and parameters such as node selection and edge number are unexplored. To enable quantitative rigor in RBFE designs, I propose to modernize LOMAP, to find statistically optimal graphs over clusters of ligand series. Beyond optimal design generation, Optimal LOMAP will provide users with theoretically determined design space parameters and statistical tools for improved error correction. This poster on FEP design optimization was presented at OpenEye CUP XXI in March 2022.
optimal, LOMAP, graph theory, free energy perturbation, lead optimization, binding free energy, drug discovery
optimal, LOMAP, graph theory, free energy perturbation, lead optimization, binding free energy, drug discovery
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 2 |