ABSTRACT: The phrase “courtage” assumes the role of an infrequent term as regards common and specialized language within legal, linguistic or historic domains as well as other various areas. The conception of “courtage” encompasses the acceptance of “mediation”, whereas the syntagm of “matrimonial courtage”, a collocation or expression that characterizes the argot of the field of family law, is a reference to the mediation being realized via escort services/matrimonial agencies. The string of words at issue does not avail a regulation in point of Romanian legislation, still, if the term is perceived with the meaning of convention/contract, case in which is allowed to the Romanian legislator. The current paper is intended as an analysis with respect to matrimonial courtage in relation with the conduct/behavior of individuals that decide to choose this type of mediation, taking into consideration the integral and comprehensive execution/accomplishment of contractual obligations that are assumed on the part of contractual partners along with the possible corresponding deviations from the rule that might occur. KEYWORDS: agreement, contract, mediation, courtage, marital/matrimonial courtage, credence