Views provided by UsageCounts
The aim of the meeting for administrative staff was to present and discuss some important administrative and financial issues. Key focus areas were beneficiaries' responsibilities, eligible and ineligible costs in H2020 project funding, direct and indirect costs, time recording, budget transfers, third party arrangements, reporting, open access and data management, ethics, and the requirement to acknowledge EU funding in all communications. The meeting with research team leads focused on the overall work package (WP) structure, the importance of the interaction between WPs, exchanges, feedback loops and information flows. Also, partners' specific tasks, and timing of WPs, tasks, milestones and deliverables (Gantt chart) was discussed. Particular attention was paid to WP1 and WP2 tasks and their initiation as first actions and outcomes are essential inputs to subsequent WPs.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts