Views provided by UsageCounts
Results of a survey with 242 participants on connections between assumed benefits of visualizations in the library context and research behavior aspects (frequency of digital material usage, material focus, research subjects etc.). Additionally, participants were subjected to the visualization "An Ocean of Books" by Gaël Hugo and instructed to choose up to five adjectives out of the reaction cards subset proposed by Merčun[1]. The head of the file contains the question ID, the question itself, and short information on the data type. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions! [1] T. Merčun. Evaluation of information visualization techniques: analysing user experience with reaction cards. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, BELIV ’14, pp. 103–109. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2014. doi: 10.1145/2669557.2669565
Information Visualization, Digital Libraries, Survey, User-Centered Design
Information Visualization, Digital Libraries, Survey, User-Centered Design
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts