Views provided by UsageCounts
Fagineura crenativora group Diagnostic characters. Major axis of eye in lateral view 2–4 × distance from eye to dorsalmost point of head (Figs 1C, 6M). Frontal pit dorsally with median groove (Figs 6P, Q). Clypeus with width 3.2–3.8 × maximum height (Fig. 7B); maximum height 0.8–1.0 × torulus height; ventral emargination distinct and wide; depth of emargination 0.3–0.6 × median height of clypeus. Mandibles symmetric (Figs 7A, B); in outer view, each rather sharply tapered basally, gradually tapered from middle to apex (Figs 7A, D, E, J, K), with low and dull apical carina on each of anterior and posterior surfaces (Figs 7P, Q). Ventral edge of epicnemium narrowly and distinctly grooved. Katepimeron extensively or posteriorly covered with setae, sometimes with only a few or several setae. In fore wing, vein C apically slightly or distinctly dilated, and cell Sc 0.3–1.0 × as wide as vein C at middle point of origin of vein Rs+M (Figs 8W, X); crossvein 2r-rs absent (Figs 1B, F, J, M, 2B, E). In female abdomen, cercus about 4–6 × as long as wide (Figs 9A, B, I, J). Valvula 3 apically emarginate or pointed in dorsal view (Figs 9A, B; fig. 2f in Liu et al. 2019). In lance, radix without subdorsal carina (Figs 10A–C). In lancet, tangium with or without pores (Figs 11A–C); sclerotized part before lamnium being narrow transverse band; annulus 1 anteriorly with transverse colorless area with ctenidium. In male abdomen, penis valve with valvispina directed posteroventrally (Figs 14K–N). Remarks. The F. crenativora group is distinguished from the F. quercivora group as stated in the key above. In all members of the group, the lancet has the annulus 1 with a ctenidium in a distinct transverse colorless area and the sclerotized part before the annulus 1 being a narrow transverse band (Figs 11A–C; figs 2A–H in Liu et al. 2021). In the related genera such as Euura, Nematus and Pristiphora and the F. quercivora group, the annulus 1 usually does not have a ctenidium (see Benson 1958, Liston et al. 2017, Prous et al. 2017, 2019, 2021), and if it has a ctenidium, the area around the ctenidium is not widely colorless or the sclerotized part before the lamnium is absent or does not become a narrow transverse band (e.g. figs 22, 24 in Smith 2012; Fig. 13E). Therefore, this character of the F. crenativora group appears to be unique in the Nematinae and may support the monophyly of the group.
Published as part of Hara, Hideho & Ibuki, Shinichi, 2022, A study of the genus Fagineura (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae, Nematinae), pp. 223-252 in Zootaxa 5116 (2) on page 228, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5116.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/6367255
Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Tenthredinidae, Fagineura crenativora, Hymenoptera, Taxonomy, Fagineura
Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Tenthredinidae, Fagineura crenativora, Hymenoptera, Taxonomy, Fagineura
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts