Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2022
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Endoscopic Vision Challenge 2022

Authors: Aneeq Zia; Xi Liu; Kiran Bhattacharyya; Ziheng Wang; Max Berniker; Anthony Jarc; Chinedu Nwoye; +19 Authors

Endoscopic Vision Challenge 2022

Abstract

With the advent of artificial intelligence as key technology in modern medicine, surgical data science (SDS) promises to improve the quality and value of the particular domain of interventional healthcare through capturing, organization, analysis, and modeling of data, thus creating benefit for both patients and medical staff. Holistic SDS concepts span the topics of context-aware perception in and beyond the operating room, data interpretation and real-time assistance or decision support. At the same time, minimally invasive surgery using cameras to observe the internal anatomy has become the state-of-the-art approach to many surgical procedures. Contributing to the key aspect of perception, endoscopic vision thus constitutes a central component of SDS and computer-assisted interventions. From this arises the necessity for high-quality common datasets that allow the scientific community to perform comparative benchmarking and validation of endoscopic vision algorithms. With EndoVis, we present you a large collection of publicly accessible datasets comprising various computer vision tasks (classification, segmentation, detection, localization,���) and subdisciplines ranging from laparoscopy to coloscopy and surgical training. These datasets can be used for both de novo development as well as validation of methods. EndoVis organizes highprofile international challenges for the comparative validation of endoscopic vision algorithms that focus on different problems each year at MICCAI, thus representing a major driving force of advancements in the field. This year we propose 5 different sub-challenges under the umbrella of EndoVis: SurgToolLoc - Endoscopic surgical tool localization by leveraging tool presence labels CholecTriplet2022 - Surgical Action Triplet Detection and Localization SAR-RARP50 - Instrumentation segmentation and Action Recognition on robotic Radical Prostatectomy SimCol-to-3D: Simulated Colonoscopy data for 3D (scene) reconstruction SurgT - a challenge for tissue tracking in surgery

Keywords

Multitask learning, surgical action detection, Surgical activity detection, Colonoscopy,, pose estimation, MICCAI, Segmentation, Surgical instrument segmentation, depth estimation, Computer Assisted Interventions, Challenge, Prostatectomy, weak learning, action triplet, Tracking, Surgical action recognition, deep learning, Endoscopy, object detection, Robotic surgery, Surgical Vision, Classification, Detection, tool-tissue interaction, laparoscopic video, CholecT50, Laparoscopy, medical image analysis, object localization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 177
    download downloads 158
  • 177
    views
    158
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
177
158
Related to Research communities