Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Large Defect Prediction Benchmark

Authors: Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn;

Large Defect Prediction Benchmark

Abstract

This is a collection of defect datasets for the software engineering research community. This collection is from 8 corpus as follows: AEEEM-defect-dataset: M. D’Ambros, M. Lanza, and R. Robbes, “Evaluating defect prediction approaches: A benchmark and an extensive comparison,”Empirical Softw. Engg., vol. 17, no. 4-5, pp. 531–577, Aug. 2012. JIRA-defect-dataset: S. Yatish, J. Jiarpakdee, P. Thongtanunam, and C. Tantithamthavorn,“Mining software defects: Should we consider affected releases?” in The International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2019. JIT-defect-datasets S. McIntosh, Y. Kamei, "Are Fix-Inducing Changes a Moving Target? A Longitudinal Case Study of Just-In-Time Defect Prediction", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE). Line-level-defect-prediction: S Wattanakriengkrai, P Thongtanunam, C Tantithamthavorn, H Hata, and K Matsumoto, "Predicting Defective Lines Using a Model-Agnostic Technique", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE). NASA-defect-dataset: Relink-defect-dataset: R. Wu, H Zhang, S Kim, and SC. Cheung. "Relink: recovering links between bugs and changes." In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineering, pp. 15-25. 2011. TeraPromise-defect-dataset: M. Jureczko and L. Madeyski, “Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, ser. PROMISE ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 9:1–9:10. Zimmermann-defect-dataset T. Zimmermann, R Premraj, A Zeller. "Predicting defects for Eclipse." Third International Workshop on Predictor Models in Software Engineering (PROMISE'07: ICSE Workshops 2007). IEEE, 2007.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 161
    download downloads 27
  • 161
    views
    27
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
161
27