Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This deliverable describes the process and results of monitoring and evaluating the engagement process in the five WeCount case studies. As a final deliverable, it outlines the evaluation rationale, describes the methodology in detail and provides a cross-comparison of all case studies. The full evaluation kit is included. The monitoring and evaluation have been led by Margarida Sardo (UWE), with contributions from Sophie Laggan (UWE), Laura Fogg Rogers (UWE), Elke Franchois (Mobiel21), Anke Bracke (Mobiel21) and Bal��zs N��meth (POLIS). The monitoring and evaluation were done in collaboration with the Case Studies, who were responsible for applying the evaluation framework and collecting data.
public engagement, evaluation, policy change, transport, cities, Citizen science, air quality, carbon management
public engagement, evaluation, policy change, transport, cities, Citizen science, air quality, carbon management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts