Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Lisp is the second oldest programming language, and the first one to value productivity more than raw execution speed. This initial disregard for performance has indeed led to some mind-bogglingly slow implementations, especially in the early days, but modern Lisp compilers such as SBCL have almost fully closed the performance gap to the fastest imperative programming languages. Almost, but not quite: Until now, many loop optimizations and support for single instruction, multiple data (SIMD) programming are still missing in Lisp. We correct this deficiency with two libraries: The first one is sb-simd, an SBCL-specific library that provides convenient bindings for various SIMD instructions sets. The second one is Loopus, a portable loop optimization framework that works via macros and source to source transformations. The most prominent features of Loopus are its optimization of array accesses and that, on SBCL, it automatically applies SIMD vectorization to certain loops. We conclude with a performance evaluation for several example programs, and show that Lisp code using our libraries can achieve up to 94% of the performance of highly optimized C code.
Common Lisp, Loop Optimization, SIMD
Common Lisp, Loop Optimization, SIMD
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 619 | |
| downloads | 506 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts