Views provided by UsageCounts
Cyclemys dentata (Gray 1831:20, Errata) Emys dhor Gray 1830:8 Syntypes (at least 9): BMNH 1946.1.22.62 (formerly 1828.5.12.1) and 1946.1.22.63 (formerly 1828.5.12.2); OUM 8512-13, and 8867 (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:11); and RMNH 6062, 6063, 6067, and 40474 (Hoogmoed et al. 2010:8). BMNH 1946.1.22.62 designated lectotype by Fritz et al. (1997:188) and sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz (2008) and Fritz et al. (2008). Note that OUM 8512-8513 are also syntypes of Cyclemys orbiculata (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:11), and that RMNH 6062 has been identified as C. enigmatica (Hoogmoed et al. 2010:9). Cyclemys orbiculata Bell 1834:17 Syntypes (at least 5): BMNH 1946.1.22.62-63 (formerly 1828.5.12.1-2); and OUM 8512-13 (both illustrated by Bell 1836 [part 8], upper figure, Plate 3; and in Plate XXV by Sowerby & Lear 1872; both sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz 2008), and 8867 (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:10). BMNH 1946.1.22.62 designated as neotype (and photographed) by Fritz et al. (1997:188) prior to the rediscovery of the OUM syntypes. The BMNH syntypes are also syntypes for Emys dhor Gray and OUM 8513 is a syntype of Cyclemys bellii Gray 1863, and was sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz (2008) and Nowak-Kemp & Fritz (2010:10). Cistudo diardii Duméril & Bibron 1835:227 Syntypes (5): MNHN 9104-08; BMNH 1868.12.11.164 listed as this taxon by Gray (1873:24). Cyclemys ovata Gray 1863:178 Holotype: BMNH 1863.6.21.1 (sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz 2008 and Fritz et al. 2008). Cyclemys bellii Gray 1863:179 Holotype: OUM 8513 (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:10; illustrated by Bell 1836 [part 8], upper figure, Plate 3; and by Sowerby & Lear 1872: Pl. XXV; photographed in Fritz et al. 2008:382; sampled genetically by Stuart & Fritz 2008). Note that the holotype is also a syntype of Cyclemys orbiculata Bell 1834 and Emys dhor Gray 1830 (Nowak-Kemp & Fritz 2010:10). Das (2005) erroneously listed OUM 8867 as holotype (see Stuart & Fritz 2008:134). Cyclemys enigmatica Fritz, Guicking, Auer, Sommer, Wink, & Hundsdörfer 2008:381 Holotype: NMW 9811; paratypes (10), NHMW 1188, 29524, 29528; RMNH 3838, 6066, 6068, and 27828 (Hoogmoed et al. 2010:5); ZMA 19029:1, 19029:2 (photographedin the originaldescription, p. 382, Fig. 12, and Fritz et al. 2008:380); and ZSM 850.1920. Cyclemys fusca Fritz, Guicking, Auer, Sommer, Wink, & Hundsdörfer 2008:383 Holotype: MTD 42578 (photographed in the original description, p. 383, Fig. 13); paratypes (10), CAS 210070; MTD 40842-43, 41611-14, 42596, and 44176-77. Cyclemys gemeli Fritz, Guicking,Auer, Sommer, Wink, & Hundsdörfer 2008:384 Holotype: NMW 37153 (sampled genetically in Fritz et al. 2008); no paratypes designated.
Published as part of Iverson, John B., 2022, A review of Chelonian type specimens (order Testudines), pp. 1-85 in Megataxa 7 (1) on page 23, DOI: 10.11646/megataxa.7.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5964441
Cyclemys dentata, Reptilia, Testudines, Animalia, Cyclemys, Biodiversity, Chordata, Geoemydidae, Taxonomy
Cyclemys dentata, Reptilia, Testudines, Animalia, Cyclemys, Biodiversity, Chordata, Geoemydidae, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts