Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The family Lycosidae is a large family with 2428 known genera. From South Africa 24 genera represent by 110 species of which 60 species are endemics. Since the use of pitfall trap in terrestrial invertebrate surveys, the number of lycosids in spider collections has increased dramatically. Several authors have stated that, at present, the taxonomy of lycosid spiders is far from well understood. The number of African wolf spider species is very high, and thorough revisions are needed to clarify the situation. The Afrotropical representatives were revised by Roewer (1959, 1960) in a voluminous, amply illustrated revision. Unfortunately this work abounds with inaccuracies and should be used with caution (Alderweireldt & Jocqué 1992). The need for thorough revision of this abundant family is, as a consequence, pressing. So far the following African genera have recently been revised: Ocyale (Alderweireldt 1966), Chaleposa (Russell-Smith 1981), Trabae (Russell-Smith 1982), Evippomma (Alderweireldt 1992), nebulosa-group of Pardosa (Alderweireldt & Jocqué 1992), Tricassa (Alderweireldt & Jocqué 1993), Hippasa (Alderweireldt & Jocqué, 2005), Minicosa (Alderweireldt & Jocqué 2007) and Pterartoria (Russell-Smith & Roberts 2017). Of the presently known South African species 63% of the species are listed as Least Concern and the rest are Data Deficient with 66 % known only from one sex. Only one species Pterartoria cederbergensis Russell-Smith & Roberts, 2017 is presently listed as Critical Rare.
South Africa National Survey of Arachnida, conservation, Lycosidae, South Africa National Survey of Arachnida, biodiversity
South Africa National Survey of Arachnida, conservation, Lycosidae, South Africa National Survey of Arachnida, biodiversity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts