Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A1.3.5: Report on the results from the inter-comparison of the primary standards and improved measurement facilities for flow rates from 5 nL/min to 1500 nL/min (with uncertainty targets of 1 % (k=2) for steady flow and 2 % (k=2) for fast changing flow)

Authors: Chris Mills; John Morgan; Elsa Batista; Jan Gersl; Hugo Bissig; Florestan Ogheard; Oliver Büker; +5 Authors

A1.3.5: Report on the results from the inter-comparison of the primary standards and improved measurement facilities for flow rates from 5 nL/min to 1500 nL/min (with uncertainty targets of 1 % (k=2) for steady flow and 2 % (k=2) for fast changing flow)

Abstract

This comparison is organized within the scope of the Task 1.3 of the EMPIR project MeDDII (Metrology for Drug Delivery). The aim of this task is to validate the developed primary standards for flow rates below 1500 nL/min. This will allow the participating laboratories to test the agreement of their results and uncertainties despite the use of different equipment and calibration methods for the calibration of two different flow meters and a syringe pump. Overall Objective: Using input from A1.3.1 ��� A1.3.4, NEL, IPQ, CETIAT, METAS, RISE, DTI, HS, Bronkhorst, and THL have reported the results from the inter-comparison of the primary standards and improved measurement facilities for flow rates from 5 nL/min to 1500 nL/min (with uncertainty targets of 1 % (k=2) for steady flow and 2 % (k=2) for fast changing flow). NEL acted as the pilot laboratory by analyzing the data and producing the final report. METAS performed the initial and final measurements in this inter-comparison to test the stability of the flow meters over time and IPQ tested the stability of the CETONI Nemesys pump over time. This comparison is organized within the scope of the Task 1.3 of the EMPIR project MeDDII (Metrology for Drug Delivery). The aim of this task is to validate the developed primary standards for flow rates below 1500 nL/min. This will allow the participating laboratories to test the agreement of their results and uncertainties despite the use of different equipment and calibration methods for the calibration of two different flow meters and a syringe pump. Overall Objective: Using input from A1.3.1 ��� A1.3.4, NEL, IPQ, CETIAT, METAS, RISE, DTI, HS, Bronkhorst, and THL have reported the results from the inter-comparison of the primary standards and improved measurement facilities for flow rates from 5 nL/min to 1500 nL/min (with uncertainty targets of 1 % (k=2) for steady flow and 2 % (k=2) for fast changing flow). NEL acted as the pilot laboratory by analyzing the data and producing the final report. METAS performed the initial and final measurements in this inter-comparison to test the stability of the flow meters over time and IPQ tested the stability of the CETONI Nemesys pump over time.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Comparison, microflow

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 7
  • 4
    views
    7
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
7
Green