Views provided by UsageCounts
23. Anopheles (Anopheles) messeae Falleroni, 1926 (Fig. 4E) Published source: Kirik et al. (2020: 5). Voucher material: 1♀, Punaküla (58° 20′ 9″ N, 25° 20′ 4″ E), 31.V.–03.VI.2018, H. Kirik leg., H. Kirik det., Mosquito Magnet trap, IZBE0210221, GenBank: OK465170; 1♀, Tartu (58° 21′ 26″ N, 26° 42′ 60″ E), 04.IX.2017, T. Kesküla leg., H. Kirik det., sweep net, IZBE0210222, GenBank: OK465171; 1♀, Tartu (58° 21′ 13″ N, 26° 40′ 45” E), 17.IX.2017, T. Kesküla leg., H. Kirik det., sweep net, IZBE0210223, GenBank: OK465172. Comment: Anopheles messeae belongs to the An. maculipennis complex. Based on COI sequences, 17 mosquitoes among 20 specimens of the complex subjected to genetic analyses were identified as An. messeae or An. daciae Linton, Nicolescu & Harbach, 2004 (in Nicolescu et al. 2004). This indicates that An. messeae / daciae most likely make up the majority of the 215 (0.9% of all specimens collected) specimens of the complex collected in this study. Anopheles messeae and An. daciae are difficult to distinguish based on COI sequences at this time, but the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of one Estonian An. messeae specimen was sequenced in a previous study (Kirik et al. 2020). All in all, individuals belonging to the An. maculipennis complex could be found from May to October, but were more numerous in August. The abundance of mosquitoes of the complex may be underestimated in this study due to collection bias.
Published as part of Kirik, Heli, Tummeleht, Lea & Kurina, Olavi, 2022, Rediscovering the mosquito fauna (Diptera: Culicidae) of Estonia: an annotated checklist with distribution maps and DNA evidence, pp. 261-287 in Zootaxa 5094 (2) on page 271, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/5965149
Insecta, Culicidae, Arthropoda, Diptera, Anopheles, Animalia, Biodiversity, Anopheles messeae, Taxonomy
Insecta, Culicidae, Arthropoda, Diptera, Anopheles, Animalia, Biodiversity, Anopheles messeae, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts