Views provided by UsageCounts
Phyllhermannia Berlese, 1916 Phyllhermannia Berlese, 1916, p. 65. Berlese created Phyllhermannia as a subgenus of Hermannia, with Hermannia phyllophora (Michael, 1908, p. 140, pl. XX figs. 17-23) from New Zealand as type. He did not give a diagnosis and probably he had not seen the type-species. In the Michael Collection in the British Museum (Natural History) I found a specimen labelled as Hermannia palmifer, which is certainly the one described by Michael as H. phyllophora; it originates from the same locality (Ruahine Range, New Zealand). The slide is not suited for a detailed study, but I could observe that there are lanceolate hairs on the notogaster, which Michael overlooked. The specimen must, however, be remounted for further study. For the moment the systematic position of Phyllhermannia phyllophora remains therefore doubtful; it has a superficial resemblance to Hermannia, but in other characters it reminds of the higher Oribatei.
Published as part of van der Hammen, L., 1959, Berlese's Primitive Oribatid Mites, pp. 1-93 in Zoologische Verhandelingen 40 on page 84
Hermanniidae, Hermannia, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Phyllhermannia, Animalia, Biodiversity, Sarcoptiformes, Taxonomy
Hermanniidae, Hermannia, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Phyllhermannia, Animalia, Biodiversity, Sarcoptiformes, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts