Views provided by UsageCounts
Epilohmannia Berlese, 1916 Epilohmannia Berlese, 1916a, p. 176. Lesseria Oudemans, 1917a, p. 78. Epilohmannia Berlese (1916) has priority against Lesseria Oudemans (1917a). Both genera have the same species (cylindrica Berlese) as type, although Oudemans gave the name Lesseria szanislói (Oudemans, 1915a) to his 1917a speeimens. (The name szanislói is not in use, and below I note that it is indeed incorrect to do so). Berlese did not give a generic diagnosis: he designated the type and added three new species. Berlese described seven representatives of the genus: two from Florence (also known by redescriptions), one from East Africa, one from South America, and three from North America (the type of one of these is lost) 1) The specimens must be remounted in order to enable sufficient comparisons (the characters mentioned in Berlese's diagnoses are still visible). The following is therefore little more than a catalogue. 1) Jacot (1934) described a species from Hawaii.
Published as part of van der Hammen, L., 1959, Berlese's Primitive Oribatid Mites, pp. 1-93 in Zoologische Verhandelingen 40 on page 53
Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Epilohmannia, Biodiversity, Sarcoptiformes, Taxonomy, Epilohmanniidae
Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Epilohmannia, Biodiversity, Sarcoptiformes, Taxonomy, Epilohmanniidae
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts