Views provided by UsageCounts
Pseudotritia ardua (C. L. Koch, 1841) Hoplophora ardua C. L. Koch, 1841, fasc. 32 (15). Tritia lentula, Berlese, 1887a, fasc. 36 (3); 1896b, p. 20. Phthiracarus canestrinii Michael, 1898, p. 81. Phtiracarus canestrinii, Berlese, 1913a, p. 55. Tritia ardua, Sellnick, 1923, p. 12, figs. 1, 12, 23, 24. Oribotritia ardua, Sellnick, 1928, p. 39. Pseudotritia ardua, Jacot, 1930, p. 243, pl. 38 figs. 44-51; Märkel, 1958, p. 486, fig. 5. Oribotritia loricata, Willmann, 1931, p. 194, fig. 358. Berlese's figure of Tritia lentula (non lentula C. L. Koch) demonstrates that the species has one lateral ridge on the aspis, and a slightly thickened sensillus; it is therefore identical with Pseudotritia ardua (C. L. Koch), and different from the related species P. duplicata Grandjean (cf. Märkel, 1958). In the Berlese Collection I studied two slides (nos. 215/41, 42) with speciniens from Torino that are ardua indeed. I remark that Michael's arduus is duplicata, whilst he gave the name canestrinii to our ardua. Berlese (1913a) apparently accepted this opinion, for at that time he mentioned arduus as well as canestrinii. Probably both species are present in the Collection, because Lombardini (1936, p. 50) mentioned both Tritia ardua and Tritia lentula (Michael's canestrinii) in his Catalogue.
Published as part of van der Hammen, L., 1959, Berlese's Primitive Oribatid Mites, pp. 1-93 in Zoologische Verhandelingen 40 on pages 36-37
Oribatida, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Pseudotritia ardua, Biodiversity, Euphthiracaridae, Pseudotritia, Taxonomy
Oribatida, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Pseudotritia ardua, Biodiversity, Euphthiracaridae, Pseudotritia, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts