Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Supplementary Material for "Evaluating Classifiers in SE Research: The ECSER Pipeline and Two Replication Studies"

Authors: Davide Dell'Anna; Fatma Başak Aydemir; Fabiano Dalpiaz;

Supplementary Material for "Evaluating Classifiers in SE Research: The ECSER Pipeline and Two Replication Studies"

Abstract

This supplementary material for the article"Evaluating Classifiers in SE Research: The ECSER Pipeline and Two Replication Studies. Dell’Anna, D.; Aydemir, F. B.; and Dalpiaz, F. Empirical Software Engineering. 2022" includes ECSER-ExploratoryStudy.csv: The annotated meta-data of the papers that have been published in ICSE between 2019 and 2021. ECSER_ROCplots+StatTest.ipynb: A python notebook that compares classifiers adn checks the statistical significance of the comparison results. ECSER_SummaryOfReplicationSteps.pdf: This table presents a summary of ECSER steps for the two original studies and our applications on ECSER. ECSER_RE: The directory that holds the datasets and code for the replication of Hay et al. [1] and additional runs on the new data sets. ECSER_FF: The directory that holds the code and data for the replication of Alshammari et al. [2] README.md presents the structure of the supplementary materials. requirements.txt lists the dependencies needed to run the code In the ECSER_RE directory, the code for multiple classifiers that are compared are kept in the "Classifiers" directory. The public data sets are shared in the Datasets directory. "ECSER_RE_Compare_Classifiers.ipynb" python notebook includes the code that runs each classifier. The results are presented in "ECSER_RE_results-Promise-vs-all.csv". In the ECSER_FF directory, the data sets are presented directly under the main directory. The notebook "ECSER-FF-Compare_Classifiers.ipynb" compares the classifiers of the original study and the results are kept under the "ECSER_FF_results" directory. How to cite this repository If you use this repository, please cite the reference paper, and the repository, as below: Dell’Anna, Davide, Fatma Başak Aydemir, and Fabiano Dalpiaz. "Evaluating classifiers in SE research: the ECSER pipeline and two replication studies." Empirical Software Engineering 28.1 (2023): 3. Davide Dell'Anna, Fatma Başak Aydemir, & Fabiano Dalpiaz. (2021). Supplementary Material for "Evaluating Classifiers in SE Research: The ECSER Pipeline and Two Replication Studies" [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6266675 Tobias Hey, Jan Keim, Anne Koziolek, and Walter F. Tichy. 2020. SupplementaryMaterial of "NoRBERT: Transfer Learning for Requirements Classification". https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3874137 Abdulrahman Alshammari, Christopher Morris, Michael Hilton, and JonathanBell. 2021. FlakeFlagger: Predicting Flakiness Without Rerunning Tests. In43rdIEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2021, Madrid,Spain, 22-30 May 2021. IEEE, 1572–1584. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00140

Keywords

Machine Learning, Automated Classification, Software Engineering

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 187
    download downloads 43
  • 187
    views
    43
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
187
43