Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Open and FAIR Data - Meeting of Societies - Workshop Reports

Authors: Stall, Shelley;

Open and FAIR Data - Meeting of Societies - Workshop Reports

Abstract

This workshop was funded by the National Science Foundation, Grant ID 1838990. This goals and objectives of the workshop are meant to bring awareness to scientific societies supporting the natural sciences and adjacent sciences on how they can help meet the aspirations of open and FAIR data, request that natural science societies and adjacent sciences actively communicate with their members on the importance of open and FAIR data, share resources that are available to support better understanding that support intentional culture change. We had nearly 40 participants representing 18 societies attend the workshop. Additional conversations were had with participants that could not make it to the meeting increasing exposure to 25 societies. Participating societies provided updates on their progress in encouraging and requiring open and FAIR data sharing. This sharing brought an awareness of both common challenges and those that are more unique, but important in cross-discipline, transdisciplinary, or collaborative efforts. There was positive support to continue working together on the challenges around data and software sharing as a broad community. During our breakout session on the first day we challenged the participants with creating a five-year vision for data sharing considering three different aspects. This activity helped to establish a positive tone for the evening discussion at dinner and the work to come on the second day. Five-year vision of: Make depositing open and FAIR data a priority for all Societies recognize and incentivize FAIR data practices Global infrastructure to support FAIR data and tools A brief summary of what each breakout session includes in their vision is included in the attached document: Open and FAIR data - Meeting of Societies - Five-year Visioning - 19-20 June 2019.pdf A summery of the value proposition exercise conducted on the second day that explored the roles of different stakeholders with the society to encourage open and FAIR data sharing is included in the attached document: Open and FAIR data - Meeting of Societies - Value Proposition Exercise Outcomes - 19-20 June 2019.pdf. Meeting objectives: Share our efforts (including participants) to move towards Open and FAIR Data, the building blocks of Open Science. Consider what a society needs to implement Open and FAIR data in both their publishing and for their membership activities. Collectively discuss what is working, challenges, and how they can be addressed. Continue to work together to incrementally improve and share ideas. Agenda Wednesday, June 19th - Workshop Day One (all times in EDT) 7:30 Breakfast 8:30 Welcome, meeting overview, expectations, shared google doc, Shelley Stall 9:00 Open and FAIR Data and the Importance of Societies (20 min per speaker) Brooks Hanson - Executive Vice President of Science, AGU Erin Robinson - Executive Director, ESIP Heather Joseph - Executive Director, SPARC Beth Plale - Science Advisor for Public Access, NSF 10:15 Integrative dialogue & Group Introductions (data challenges facing society, what do you hope to get out of this workshop? 11:00 Break 11:30 Introduction to Enabling FAIR Data Method, Shelley Stall How did the Earth Science Community get here (10 min) Project Overview (10 min) 11:20 Enabling FAIR Data Tool Kit, Shelley Stall What: Commitment Statement & Researcher, Publisher, and Society Commitments How: Author Guidelines for Data & FAQs Outreach & Community building at Society meetings 12:10 - Group Discussion - General reactions, questions about AGU approach and what else should be in the toolkit? 12:30 Lunch - Table discussion: Identifying other components of the tool kit 1:15 Enabling FAIR Data Tool Kit Continuation - Technology Eric Olson - ORCiD Martin Fenner - DataCite Tech ideas for tool kit? 2:10 FAIR work in Chemistry - Leah McEwen, IUPAC 2:30 FAIR work in ENVRI and EGU - Helen Glaves, BGS 2:50 Small group Discussion on Initiatives by Participating Societies & Other things to be included in toolkit 3:15 Break 3:30 Establish 2025 success vision for: Make depositing open and FAIR data a priority for all Societies recognize and incentivize FAIR data practices. Global infrastructure to support FAIR data and tools. 4:15 Reports from Breakout Groups (including potential ‘disconnects’ for Day 2 Dialogue)& Integrative Dialogue 5:15 Wrap-up and Anticipate Day Two Discussion 5:30 Adjourn Day One 6:30 Dinner at https://www.lauriolplaza.com Thursday, June 20th - Workshop Day Two (all times in EDT) 7:30 Breakfast 8:30 Check-in 9:00 National Academies Open Science, Reproducibility, and TOP Guidelines Open Science by Design - Marcia McNutt, President, National Academy of Sciences 9:30 Q& A 10:00 Break 10:15 Society Efforts around Open and FAIR Data (5 min each) Helen Glaves, EGU Mike Friedman, AMS Gus Muench, AAS Angela Hunter, ACS 10:45 - Data Sharing - Value Proposition Activity - Leah McEwen Societies Reviewers Publishers 11:45 Report from the Value Proposition 12:15 - Lunch - Discussion on Gaps, Challenges, and Possible Items to Adopt from Others 1:00 - Reporting on Discussion Topics: Gaps, Challenges, and Possible Items to Adopt from Others 2:00 Develop Concrete Next Steps Does the group want to stay in touch? Communication channels? Additional Meetings? Engage with other societies? 3:00 Adjourn

Keywords

FAIR Data, Open Data

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 5
  • 2
    views
    5
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
5
Green