Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2007
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2007
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2007
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Gephyromantis ambohitra Vences and Glaw 2001

Authors: Randrianiaina, Roger-Daniel; Glaw, Frank; Thomas, Meike; Glos, Julian; Raminosoa, Noromalala; Vences, Miguel;

Gephyromantis ambohitra Vences and Glaw 2001

Abstract

Gephyromantis ambohitra (Vences and Glaw, 2001) The following description refers to one tadpole in developmental stage 37 (field number FG/MV 2002.1963, catalogued as ZSM 790/2004, TL 26.6 mm, BL 9.5 mm) (Fig. 1), from Montagne d’Ambre National Park. Generalized tadpole of type IV of Orton (1953). In dorsal view, body ovoid with small constrictions of the body wall at the plane of spiracle. Snout large, edge of anterior labium in front of the snout. In lateral view, body depressed, maximum width attained behind midbody, BW 122 % of BH. Eyes of moderate size, ED 12 % of BL, not visible in ventral view, positioned dorsally and directed dorsolaterally situated at about 1/3 of body length. Nares elliptical, moderately sized, with dark spots, positioned dorsally, oriented anterolaterally and equidistant between snout tip and eye. NN 64 % of PP. Spiracle sinistral with its inner wall free and formed such that the aperture opens laterally instead of posteriorly, visible in dorsal view. Spiracular opening round, positioned laterally, directed dorsolaterally, situated at the height of the longitudinal axis of caudal musculature and much closer to the end of the body than to the snout, SS 55 % of BL. Medial vent tube tubular, medial, with both walls attached directly to ventral fin. Caudal musculature moderately developed, myosepta visible in dorsal view in the proximal 3/5 of the tail. TMH 42 % of BH and 49 % of MTH, TMW 36 % of BW; its height 2/5 of total height at midlength of tail. Dorsal fin inserts at the tail muscle posterior to the dorsal tail­body junction, increases quickly to attain the maximum height, then diminishes gradually to the tail tip. Ventral fin begins at the ventral terminus of the body, is constant until midtail, diminishes quickly towards tail tip. Tail tip pointed. MTH 86 % of BH, lateral line visible on the proximal 2/5 of the tail. Oral disc relatively large, ODW 29 % of BL and 51 % of BW, positioned anteroventrally, directed anteroventrally, emarginated. Two rows of marginal papillae, large medial gap anteriorly (DG 72 % of ODW), no medial gap on the posterior labium; total number of marginal papillae 79, submarginal papillae positioned in the lateral parts of the anterior and posterior labia (9 on the right and 13 on the left side). Papillae of moderate size, round or conical with rounded tip. No denticulate papillae. Labial tooth row formula (LTRF) after McDiarmid and Altig (1999) 5(2­5)/3(1), after Dubois (1995) 1:4+4/1+1:2. The density of keratodonts on A1 is about 57 per millimetre (a total of about 100). The length of interrupted anterior keratodont rows (A2, A3 and A4) decreases gradually towards the centre of the disc. Rows A­1 and P­3 have small keratodonts, in the other rows, keratodont size declines from the centre to the periphery. Both jaw sheaths coarsely serrated, with three parts having different colorations: edge, totally keratinised (black); medial part, partially keratinised (brown); base, not keratinised (white). Upper jaw sheath medially with pointed serrations, each side of the sheath smoothly curved, inversed U­shaped opening with medial convexity. Lower jaw sheath V­shaped, rounded serration on each edge, medial smoothly curved arc. General coloration in life brownish. Coloration in preservative: Dorsally body with two different pigmentation patterns: first, speckled with differently sized and irregularly formed brown spots; second, irregular pigmentation that forms a network of patches in some areas; intestinal coils and spiracle well visible; tail musculature speckled with brown spots that are irregularly distributed on each side, forming a network of spots; laterally body speckled brownish with network of brown pigments below the eyes. Caudal musculature whitish, with large networks of irregularly distributed brown spots, size and density of spots diminishing towards the tail tip. Fins translucent, with brown variable sized spots that are irregularly distributed on the fins, density of spots higher in the upper fin. Ventrally translucent over the whole surface. Variation: TL and BL of 90 tadpoles at stages 30­44, all from Montagne d’Ambre National Park (field numbers: FG/MV 2002.1926, 1940, 1946­1949, 1954­1956, and 1963­1964, catalogued as ZSM 717, 743­ 746, 756­761, 769­773, 790­795/2004) are 18.7­30.8 mm and 5.4­9.7 mm, respectively. The ratios vary in the following proportions: BW 106­134 % of BH; ED 11­24 % of BL; SS 14­72 % of BL; TMH 45­96 % of MTH; TMW 34­72 % of BW; MTH 70­114 % of BH; ODW 17­33 % of BL; ODW 33­60 % of BW.

Published as part of Randrianiaina, Roger-Daniel, Glaw, Frank, Thomas, Meike, Glos, Julian, Raminosoa, Noromalala & Vences, Miguel, 2007, Descriptions of the tadpoles of two species of Gephyromantis, with a discussion of the phylogenetic origin of direct development in mantellid frogs, pp. 53-61 in Zootaxa 1401 on page 55, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.175444

Keywords

Amphibia, Gephyromantis ambohitra, Mantellidae, Gephyromantis, Animalia, Biodiversity, Anura, Chordata, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 8
  • 8
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
8
Green