Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2008
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2008
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2008
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pylocheles (Pylocheles) mortensenii Boas 1926

Authors: Mclaughlin, Patsy A.; Lemaitre, Rafael;

Pylocheles (Pylocheles) mortensenii Boas 1926

Abstract

Pylocheles (Pylocheles) mortensenii (Boas, 1926) Pylocheles Mortensenii Boas, 1926: 40, figs. 1, 5, 6, 10A, 11B, 13, 14, 18, 25A. Pylocheles (Pylocheles) mortensenii. — Forest, 1987: 51, figs. 2a, 3a, 5a, b, 7a, 8a–i, 9a–d, 10a, b, 12a–d, 41a, pl. 2C. Material examined. Ten specimens, cl = 2.0– 2.3 mm; three dissected (examination and description by Saito & Konishi 2002). Remarks. Although Saito & Konishi (2002) referred to their larvae as a first zoea, they noted the stalked condition of the eyes, existence of a mandibular palp, well developed pereopods, six pleonal somites and the occurrence of uropodal buds. However, the presence of only four natatory setae on the exopods of each first and second maxilliped was viewed as a typical first zoeal character. The antennule of P. (P.) mortensenii was described as being incompletely segmented and lacking processes, although Saito & Konishi’s (2002, fig. 3A) figure might be interpreted as having the bud of one ramus (presumably the exopod) developed but lacking aesthetascs. Clearly, the antennule was in an early stage of development. The antenna as described and illustrated also appeared to be of an early zoeal stage, whereas the mandible, with its two-segmented palp was comparable to mandibular development seen in a late stage zoea. The maxillule was described as reduced, but whether this condition was a reflection of lecithotrophy or transition to the juvenile state is uncertain. The first and second maxillipeds had the endopods reduced, but appeared typically zoeal in structure, in contrast to the third maxilliped where the endopod had five incipient segments. Saito & Konishi (2002) concluded that the larvae of Pylocheles (P.) mortensenii were free-swimming upon hatching, and while not cultured, the authors suggested that at least one subsequent larval stage would follow. Although staked eyes and developing pereopods, uropods, and pleopod buds are indicative of advanced development, the generally typical early zoeal stage antennule and antennal of the larvae would sustain their conclusion.

Published as part of Mclaughlin, Patsy A. & Lemaitre, Rafael, 2008, Larvae of two species of Trizocheles (Decapoda: Anomura: Paguroidea: Pylochelidae: Trizochelinae), description of the adult of one, and preliminary implications of development on pylochelid phylogeny, pp. 52-68 in Zootaxa 1911 on page 59, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.184552

Keywords

Animalia, Pylocheles mortensenii, Biodiversity, Pylocheles, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green