Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2008
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2008
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2008
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Chetoneura Colless

Authors: Amorim, Dalton De Souza; Clarke, Arthur K;

Chetoneura Colless

Abstract

Chetoneura Colless Chetoneura Colless 1962: 437. Type –species, Chetoneura cavernae Colless, by original designation. Diagnosis. Adult mouthparts reduced, two ocelli, flagellum laterally compressed, mediotergite weakly sclerotized, with a group of setae medially. Wing vein R4 absent; wing veins dark, membrane brownish, but without maculation. Gonostyle of male club–shaped, not bifid. Female terminalia with largely developed gonapophyses 8, entirely involving the distal part of the terminalia. Larva inhabiting caves. Comments. Colless (1962) listed some features present in his new species C. cavernae as diagnostic of the genus Chetoneura. Among them are the flattened flagellomeres, the presence of only two ocelli, reduced mouthparts, presence of anepisternal setae, no postspiracular setae, laterotergite bare, regular rows of tibial setulae, and unbranched R4+5. All these features are present in the species collected in Shennong Gong, herein described. The features that differ are the absence of “strong bristles dorsally” on the “metanotum”, the short fusion of M1+2 with Rs, and the absence of a distal spine on the male gonostyle. However, there are additional features that suggested relationship between the two species, such as the general shape of the male terminalia, elongated anteriorly, the concentration of setae internally on the gonocoxites, the dorsal lobe of the gonocoxites, and the very unusual shape of the female sternite VIII. Even though the larval habitus of Chetoneura cavernae is not described, the fact that both species were collected in caves and other apomorphic morphological features suggest that the genus is monophyletic. Two other papers (McClure et al. 1967, Dittmar et al. 2005) have made reference to the Malaysian species of Chetoneura. In the original description, the position of the genus was not clear. Colless (1962) noted some features that are similar in Chetoneura and Keroplatus, such as the reduced palpus, but also listed a number of shared characteristics with Orfelia, and concluded that Chetoneura has a closer relationships to Orfelia than Keroplatus. This may have been the reason why Matile (1990) did not include the genus in the Keroplatini in his phylogenetic analysis of the tribe. The genus Chetoneura is herein formally transferred to the tribe Keroplatini.

Published as part of Amorim, Dalton De Souza & Clarke, Arthur K, 2008, Chetoneura shennonggongensis, a new species of cave – dwelling Keroplatini from China (Diptera: Keroplatidae), with a discussion of the position of Chetoneura, pp. 59-68 in Zootaxa 1716 on page 60, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.181003

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Diptera, Animalia, Keroplatidae, Chetoneura, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green