Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Acacesia tenella L. Koch 1871, comb. nov.

Authors: Framenau, Volker W.; Scharff, Nikolaj; Levi, Herbert W.;

Acacesia tenella L. Koch 1871, comb. nov.

Abstract

Acacesia tenella (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov. Figs 1 A–D, 2A–E Epeira tenella L. Koch, 1871: 76 –78, pl. 6, figs 5, 5a, 6, 6a; Butler 1876: 352. Aranea tenella (L. Koch). Roewer 1942: 834. Wixia tenella (L. Koch). Archer, 1951: 15. Araneus tenellus (L. Koch). Rainbow 1911: 194; Bonnet 1955: 609. Acacesia cornigera Petrunkevitch, 1925: 117, figs 32–41; Glueck, 1994: 73 –75, figs 2–3, 9–16. New synonymy. Types. Syntypes of Epeira tenella L. Koch, 1871: 1 male, 5 females, 1 penultimate female, 1 juvenile, listed in L. Koch (1871) from “Neuholland” (NHMW 1826. II.11) (examined). Syntypes of Acacesia cornigera Petrunkevitch, 1925: male, female, juvenile, San Lorenzo, Panama (PMY) (examined). Remarks. Ludwig Koch (1871) listed 1 male and 9 females as syntypes in his original description of Epeira tenella (p. 78, “Neun entwickelte Weibchen und ein Männchen von Neuholland ohne nähere Angabe im k. k. Museum zu Wien.”), but the vial only contained the 8 specimens listed above. This also coincides with a copy of the NHMW register which lists 8 specimens. It appears that L. Koch (1871) erroneously listed 9 females and also misinterpreted the developmental stage of some of the spiders. Acacesia cornigera was reported as widespread from central Mexico to southern Brazil and is found on both sides of the Andes (Glueck 1994). The species has quite variable male pedipalps and the posterior view of the epigynum is generally heavily sclerotised and sometimes covered with debris and therefore difficult to examine; the female illustrated here has apparently recently moulted with less sclerotised epigyne (Figs 1 D, 2B). All males from Mexico to Brazil have similar cone-shaped emboli, although it may be hidden in part by the conductor. The paracymbium is variable, Central American specimens have two distal prongs, the proximal short, the South American generally have only one (Fig. 2 D). However, there is little doubt that the syntypes of Epeira tenella and those of Acacesia cornigera represent the same species and both are synonymised here as Acacesia tenella (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov. Based on the locality label “Neu-Holland” L. Koch (1871) erroneously assumed that the spiders were collected in Australia. It is possible that the spiders were collected in the Dutch colony of the same name in northeastern Brazil, although this colony had long seized to exist when the specimens were given to the MNHW in 1826.

Published as part of Framenau, Volker W., Scharff, Nikolaj & Levi, Herbert W., 2009, Not from " Down Under ": new synonymies and combinations for orb-weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneidae) erroneously reported from Australia, pp. 22-30 in Zootaxa 2073 on pages 23-25, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.274799

Keywords

Acacesia tenella, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Araneidae, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Acacesia, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
  • 6
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
Green