Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cosetacus sharadi Menon & Joshi, 2009, n. sp.

Authors: Menon, Pratibha; Joshi, Sushila;

Cosetacus sharadi Menon & Joshi, 2009, n. sp.

Abstract

Cosetacus sharadi n. sp. (Fig. 1 A–I) Diagnosis. This species is distinguished by the following combination of characters: antapical seta present; feather claw divided, each with 4–5 rays; coxa I and II mostly smooth; coxisternal area with microtuberculate annuli. Female genital cover flap ribbed with 12–14 ridges in 2 ranks. Seta c2 hardly reaching the base of the longest seta d, seta f more than twice the length of the shortest seta e, setae h 1 absent and caudal setae h2 slightly shorter than seta d. Prodorsal shield area coarsely granulated and with small lines. Median line discernable on rear half, connected to admedian lines by cross lines at just beyond half and also ahead of rear margin. Admedian lines complete, curving back from near front of anterior lobe. First submedians curving out from anterior side of admedian lines and recurving back to admedians just before half. Second submedian lines irregular, running out to the shield margins. Body colour pale yellow. FEMALE (n=10) – Body worm like, 198±37.8 (155–260) long, 61.5±7.4 (55–75) wide. Gnathosoma projecting downwards; antapical setae 6.9±0.7 (6–8); chelicerae 21.3±2.8 (18–25); rostrum 20.1±3.6 (15–25). Prodorsal shield tapering anteriorly, however, slightly rounded at tip with numerous small granules/dots and short lines; 31.5±3.5 (26–36) long, 52.1±7.19 (42–63) wide; median line discernable on rear half, very faintly represented in the anterior shield with broken lines, median line connected to admedian lines by cross lines at two points, just a little ahead of rear margin and at about half of median. Admedian lines complete, curving out and back from near front of anterior lobe to half of shield and then running almost parallel to median. First submedian lines represented in anterior shield only, seen curving out and recurving back to admedians just before half. Second submedian lines irregular, running out to the shield margins. Dorsal tubercles near rear shield margin 26.2±2.2 (20–28) apart, directing scapular seta (sc) divergently backwards; sc 22.3±2 (18–24), spanning 9±1 (8–11) annuli. Legs lacking tibial setae. Leg I 33.6±4.2 (28–40); femur 8.1±0.7 (7–9), femoral seta (bv) 10.7±0.9 (10–12); femur without ventral lines; genu 3.7±0.8 (3–5), genual seta (l”) 23±2.2 (19–25); tibia 5.5±0.5 (5–6), tibial seta (l ’) absent; tarsus 6.5±1 (5–8), solenidion 8.2±1.5 (5–11), slightly curved, rodlike, empodium 4.7±0.6 (4–6), feather claw divided, 4–5 rayed, dorsal seta (ft’) 13±2.3 (10–17), lateral seta (ft”) 19.6±1.8 (17–22), unguinal seta (u’) 3.5±0.5 (3–4). Leg II 25 ±3.3 (21–29); femur 6.1±0.9 (5–8); bv 12±1.8 (10–14); femur without ventral lines; genu 3.5±0.5 (3–4), l” 5.9±0.7 (5–7); tibia 4.9±0.3 (4–5), l ’ absent; tarsus 6.2±0.4 (6–7), solenidion 9.5±0.5 (9–10), slightly curved, not knobbed, empodium 4.5±0.7 (4–6), feather claw divided, 4–5 rayed, ft’ 5.7±1.1 (4–7), ft” 20.7±1.8 (19–23), u’ 3.6±0.5 (3–4). Coxae I approximate centrally and not contiguous, measly granulated; coxal seta I (1b) 6.9±0.7 (5–8), 12.6±1.8 (10–14) apart; coxal seta II (1a) 23.2±3.8 (20–30), 14.8±2 (12–17) apart; coxal seta III (2a) 37.3±2.7 (36–42), 24.2±4.2 (17–30) apart. Coxisternal area without coarse granules but with annulus. Genitalia 24±5.2 (18–24) wide, 16.2±2.2 (13–19) long; epigynium ribbed with 12–14 ribs each in two ranks, lower rank with more regular ribs; genital seta (3a) 11±2.2 (9–15). Opisthosoma annuli continuous dorsoventrally. Lateral seta (c2) 13.6±1.7 (11–15), on annulus 7.7±0.4 (7–8) from the first complete ventral ring. Ventral seta I (d) 63.5±9.7 (51–75), 38.8±2.9 (36–44) apart, on annulus 17.5±1.1 (16–18); ventral seta II (e) 10.8±1.3 (9–13), 24.3±2 (21–27) apart, on annulus 28.4±1.5 (27–30); ventral seta III (f) 25±2.8 (21–28), 21.6±3.3 (17–25) apart, on annulus 55.3±3.1 (52–58). Dorsal annuli undulate with oval microtubercles but not so distinctly visible, those on posterior 12–15 annuli more elongate and triangular, total dorsal annuli 54.2±2.8 (50–57); ventral annuli with small and slightly oval microtubercles, becoming more narrow, elongate and triangular around 10–13 annuli before setae f and thereon they appear as closely spaced thin lines till the last annuli, total ventral annuli 62.3±3.3 (59–66). Caudal seta (h2) 56.8±7.1 (47–63); accessory seta (h1) absent. MALE (n=10) – Similar to female, 167±8.6 (155–175), 54.2±3 (49–55) wide. Gnathosoma projecting downwards; antapical setae 5.4±0.5 (5–6); chelicerae 20.5±1.9 (17–22); rostrum 16.5±2.5 (12–19). Prodorsal shield 28±1.8 (26–30) long, 46±2.2 (45–50) wide; Dorsal tubercles near rear shield margin 25.2±2.2 (22–28) apart, directing scapular seta (sc) divergently backwards; sc 19.2±0.7 (18–20), spanning 8±0 (8) annuli. Legs lacking tibial setae. LegI 29.5±4.2 (25–30); femur 7±0 (7), femoral seta (bv) 10.5±0.5 (10–11); genu 3.5±0.5 (3–5), genual seta (l”) 19.0±1.3 (9–21); tibia 5.2±0.4 (5–6), tibial seta (l ’) absent; tarsus 6±0.6 (5–7), solenidion 7.2±0.7 (6–8), slightly curved, not knobbed, empodium 4±0 (4), feather claw divided, 4–5 rayed, dorsal seta (ft’) 11±1.7 (8–13), lateral seta (ft”) 17.7±1.8 (16–21), unguinal seta (u’) 3.2±0.4 (3–4). LegII 24.5±1.9 (22–27); femur 6.5±1.5 (5–9); bv 10±0.6 (9–11); genu 3.2±0.4 (3–4), l” 6.5±0.5 (6–7); tibia 4.2±0.4 (4–5), l ’ absent; tarsus 5.7±0.4 (5–6), solenidion 9±0.6 (9–10), slightly curved, not knobbed, empodium 4.2±0.7 (3–5), feather claw divided, 4–5 rayed, ft’ 6.5±0.5 (6–7), ft” 18±1.4 (16–20), u’ 3±0 (3). Coxae I fused; coxal seta I (1b) 9±0 (9), 10±0 (10) apart; coxal seta II (1a) 17±2.1 (17–20), 12.5±1 (11–14) apart; coxal seta III (2a) 35.5±2.7 (32–40), 21.4±0.8 (20–22) apart. Genitalia 15±1.1 (14–17) wide, 13.7±1.2 (13–16) long; genital seta (3a) 10±1.1 (9–12). Opisthosoma lateral seta (c2) 14±1.4 (12–16), on annulus 8±0.6 (7–9) from the first complete ventral ring. Ventral seta I (d) 51.7±7.5(40–60), 33.7±0.4 (33–34) apart, on annulus 16.7±0.8 (16–18); ventral seta II (e) 10.5±0.8 (10–12), 19.7±0.4 (19–20) apart, on annulus 27±1.1 (25–28); ventral seta III (f) 23.2±2.2 (20–26), 17.5±0.8 (16–18) apart, on annulus 51.5±1.9 (48–53). Total dorsal annuli 48.2±1 (47–50), microtuberculate; total ventral annuli 58.2±2.3 (54–60), microtuberculate. Caudal seta (h2) 46.2±2.7 (43–50); accessory seta absent. Type material. Holotype female, 30 female and 10 male paratypes, from Cordia dichotoma (Boraginaceae), IARI, New Delhi, coll. Pratibha Menon, 07 March 2008, on ten microscopic preparations deposited in NPC. Also 4 paratypes on three slides will be deposited in the Insect and Mite National Collection, National Museum of Natural History (NMNH), Smithsonian Institution, U.S. D.A. and Systematic Entomology Laboratory (SEL), Beltsville, Maryland. Relation to host. Mites of this species cause whitish erineum on the under surface of leaf, gradually becoming brownish as it matures, and observed hidden in the hair like outgrowths. Etymology. The specific designation sharadi is derived from and is in honour of Mr. Sharad Pawar, Minister of Agriculture and President of Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which funds the Network Project on Insect Biosystematics. Remarks. This species differs from all species known so far viz., C. camelliae, C. citrifolis and C. eupatori in having divided feather claw and its specific shield design.

Published as part of Menon, Pratibha & Joshi, Sushila, 2009, Two new species of eriophyid mites (Acari: Eriophyidae) from India, pp. 62-68 in Zootaxa 2067 on pages 63-65, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.187009

Keywords

Arthropoda, Cosetacus sharadi, Arachnida, Prostigmata, Animalia, Cosetacus, Biodiversity, Eriophyidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2