Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Promanus Sharp 1877

Authors: Kolibáč, Jiří; Schmied, Heiko; Wappler, Torsten; Kubisz, Daniel;

Promanus Sharp 1877

Abstract

Promanus Sharp, 1877 Type species: Promanus depressus Sharp, 1877 Remarks. The type species was described in detail and illustrated by Kolibáč (2005) and its morphological characters were listed repeatedly by Kolibáč (2006). A phylogenetic position and classification within the tribe Lophocaterini were also mentioned in the latter paper and Kolibáč (2008). Two other species of Promanus, P. auripilis Broun, 1893 and P. subcostatus Broun, 1909, were studied preparing this communication. Generally, they are very similar to P. depressus, therefore, the genus is rather morphologically homogenous. Differences among all three species are listed in Table 2. P. auripilis and P. costatus are similar each other. There are no significant differences in their sternites and tergites VIII (Figs 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 19) as well as in ovipositors and membranous parts of female reproductory organs (Figs 12, 13, 16). Morphological differences mentioned in Table 2 are distinct but only single specimen of the each species was for study at disposal. That is not excluded that outer morphological characters, i.e. the elytral carinae, shape of mesosternal anterior margin, sculpture of head, body colour and body size, are variable in fact. The larger series of Promanus specimens should be studied to resolve the status of the both mentioned species. P. depressus differs distinctly from them, especially in body colour which is brown-black in all three studied specimens.

Published as part of Kolibáč, Jiří, Schmied, Heiko, Wappler, Torsten & Kubisz, Daniel, 2010, A description of Promanodes serafini gen. et sp. nov. from Baltic amber, with a review of related New Zealand Promanus Sharp, 1877 (Coleoptera: Trogossitidae), pp. 29-44 in Zootaxa 2620 (1) on page 35, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2620.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/198079

Related Organizations
Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Trogossitidae, Animalia, Promanus, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
2
Green