Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Rhabdotalebra Young

Authors: Catalano, María Inés; Paradell, Susana Liria; Lenicov, Ana María Marino Remes;

Rhabdotalebra Young

Abstract

Key to the species of the genus Rhabdotalebra Young 1 Aedeagus with processes .............................................................................................................................................. 5 - Aedeagus without processes .........................................................................................................................................2 2 Pygofer with ventral processes bifurcate at apex..........................................................................................................3 - Pygofer with ventral processes not bifurcate................................................................................................................ 4 3 Aedeagal shaft with very broad base and narrow apex with two pair of anteapical teeth (Young, 1957: fig. 29, p. 234). Sternal abdominal apodemes longer attaining second conjunctivae ..................................... R. monrosi (Young) - Aedeagal shaft slender without teeth (Young, 1957: fig. 28, p. 230). Sternal abdominal apodemes shorter not attain- ing first conjunctiva ................................................................................................................... R. jamaicensis (Young) 4 Aedeagal shaft abruptly narrowed in apical third. Sternal abdominal apodemes longer attaining second conjunctivae (Young, 1957: fig. 28, p. 230). Female seventh sternum slightly convex ..................................... R. signata (McAtee) - Aedeagal shaft gradually tapering (Young, 1957: fig. 28, p. 230). Sternal abdominal apodemes shorter not attaining first conjunctiva. Female seventh sternum shallowly concave .................................................. R. octolineata (Baker) 5 Aedeagus with single process....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Aedeagus with apical pair of processes ........................................................................................................................ 7 6 Aedeagus with apical process directed ventro-caudally. Pygofer with shorter ventral process. Connective U-shaped. Sternal abdominal apodemes attaining first conjunctiva. Female seventh sternum with rounded median lobe (Fig.1). ........................................................................................................................................................ R. litoralensis n. sp. - Aedeagus with basal process directed dorsally. Pygofer with long ventral process. Connective transverse bar shaped. Sternal abdominal apodemes not attaining first conjunctiva. Female seventh sternum slightly concave (Fig.2) .......... .................................................................................................................................................................. R. flava n. sp. 7 Pygofer process absent. Connective U-shaped. Aedeagus processes dorsally (Young, 1957: fig. 29, p. 234). Forewing with hourglass-shaped white commissural marking ......................................... R. plummeri (Ruppel & DeLong) - Pygofer with processes (occasionally not differentially sclerotized). Connective bar shaped. Aedeagus processes ventrally or laterally. Markings of forewing otherwise................................................................................................. 8 8 Aedeagus processes recurved laterally. Gonopore terminal (Young, 1957: fig. 29, p. 234). Dorsum marked with inverted ´´T´´extending over pronotum, scutellum and basal half of forewings ...................... R. hambletoni (Young) - Aedeagus processes otherwise. Gonopore subapical. Markings of dorsum otherwise ................................................ 9 9 Aedeagus processes apressed to shaft (Young, 1957: fig. 30, p. 239). Sternal abdominal apodemes shorter, attaining first conjuntiva ................................................................................................................................... R. ornata (Young) - Aedeagal process extending laterad, not appressed to shaft. Sternal abdominal apodemes longer, attaining second or third conjunctivae (Young, 1957: fig. 30, p. 239) ............................................................................ R. brunnea (Oman)

Published as part of Catalano, María Inés, Paradell, Susana Liria & Lenicov, Ana María Marino Remes, 2010, Revision of the genus Rhabdotalebra Young (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae: Alebrini) and description of two new species from Argentina, pp. 53-60 in Zootaxa 2601 on pages 54-55, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.275964

Keywords

Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Rhabdotalebra, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Related to Research communities