Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Chaetonotus (Chaetonotus) polyspinosus Greuter 1917

Authors: Kolicka, Małgorzata; Kisielewski, Jacek; Nesteruk, Teresa; Zawierucha, Krzysztof;

Chaetonotus (Chaetonotus) polyspinosus Greuter 1917

Abstract

Chaetonotus (Chaetonotus) polyspinosus Greuter, 1917 (Table 11) Locality: Site 2, 3; session I, II, III. Material: 33 specimens (27 adult and 5 juvenile), 30 specimens photographed. Remarks: A very varied species with various morphological forms described by Kisielewski (1991). The specimens from the Poznań Palm House only partially (17 from all 30 measured specimens) fit into the ranges of the ones previously reported in the literature data. A part of the observed specimens have a different total number of longitudinal alternating rows (50–58 vs 38–47 given) and thus a different ratio of scales distribution (from 88.1% vs from 94%), and a and m pharynx formulas are lower than the reference (from 21.6% and 17.4% vs from 25% and 21%, respectively). The majority of specimens have longer neck and trunk scales (up to 7.7 Μm and up to 9.9 Μm vs up to 4 Μm and up to 7 Μm, respectively), and longer straight spines on the base of the furca (up to 23.3 Μm vs up to 18 Μm). However, it cannot be questioned that all of the recorded specimens belong to the species C.(C.) polyspinosus.

Published as part of Kolicka, Małgorzata, Kisielewski, Jacek, Nesteruk, Teresa & Zawierucha, Krzysztof, 2013, Gastrotricha from the Poznań Palm House — one new subgenus and three new species of freshwater Chaetonotida (Gastrotricha), pp. 231-279 in Zootaxa 3717 (2) on page 262, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3717.2.7, http://zenodo.org/record/246596

Keywords

Gastrotricha, Chaetonotida, Chaetonotidae, Chaetonotus polyspinosus, Animalia, Biodiversity, Chaetonotus, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 9
  • 9
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
9