Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Agyneta decora O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871

Authors: Dupérré, Nadine;

Agyneta decora O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871

Abstract

Agyneta decora (O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871) Figs 1–12, 29 a,b–31, 34, 36–41, 64–71, map 1 Neriene decora O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871: 438. (Description 3). Microneta decora Simon 1884: 441. Microneta clypeata F. O. Pickard-Cambridge 1894: 90, pl. 1, f. 5. Microneta passiva O. Pickard-Cambridge 1906: 77, 89, pl. 27, f. 22–26. (3, not Ƥ, = Meioneta lugubris). Agyneta decora Hull 1911: 583. (Transferred from Microneta); Jackson 1912: 135, pl. 8, f. 3 (3, description Ƥ). Type material: Neriene decora O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871, 3 HOLOTYPE from Great Britain, Formby Hall, Liverpool, roots of grass and low plants, O. Pickard-Cambridge 1859, (OUMNH), NOT EXAMINED. Diagnosis: Males can be distinguished from all species by the leaf-like shape of the lamella characteristica (Fig. 64). From A. allosubtilis by the larger fused ventral cymbial tubercle (Fig. 65), of equal size in the latter (Fig. 80). Females can be distinguished from most Agyneta by the wide proximal part of scape with long, sinuous sides (Fig. 68). From A. perspicua by the oval receptacula of the internal genitalia (Fig. 69), peanut-shaped in the latter (Fig. 95). Description: Male: Total length 1.9; carapace length 0.83, width 0.70. CEPHALOTHORAX: Carapace orange-brown, shiny, finely reticulate; suffused with dark gray along margin, radiating lines; trident mark present. Sternum orange-brown strongly suffused with dark gray. Clypeus height 4. Chelicerae orange-brown, excavated, with transverse gray band; fangs thick and wide (Fig. 5); seta-tipped tubercles absent; promargin two teeth, retromargin one denticle, both margins without projections near base of fang. Cheliceral stridulatory organ ~59 striae, narrowly spaced throughout. ABDOMEN: Uniformly dark gray. LEGS: Yellow, leg I total length: 2.23; leg III total length: 1.79; Tm I: 0.93, Tm IV: present. GENITALIA: Palpal retrolateral tibial apophysis rounded, smooth; dorsal tibial apophysis rugose; one retrolateral, one dorsal trichobothria (Fig. 64). Cymbium triangular; glabrous depression present (Figs 9, 64), dorsal and ventral cymbial tubercles fused; prolateral notch shallow (Figs 10, 65). Paracymbium apical pocket short, anterior pocket long and curved, posterior pocket long and straight (Fig. 64). Embolus tip pointed, straight; basally with row of spines; Fickert’s gland absent; ventral lamella pointed apically; thumb reaching below the embolus proper (Fig. 66). Embolus proper set apically, with associated prong ventrally (Fig. 66). Anterior terminal apophysis narrow with few protrusions; posterior terminal apophysis wide, twisted; lamella characteristica large, with numerous small spikes, rounded apically (Fig. 67). Female: Total length 1.63; carapace length 0.72, width 0.62. CEPHALOTHORAX: Same coloration as male. Chelicerae orange, not excavated; promargin four teeth, retromargin five denticles. Cheliceral stridulatory organ ~41 striae, narrowly spaced throughout. ABDOMEN: Same as male. LEGS: Same as male, leg I total length: 2.43; leg III total length: 1.88; palpal tarsal claw absent; Tm I: 0.92, Tm IV: present. GENITALIA: Epigynum with wide proximal part of scape, sides sinuous, tapering apically; epigynal slits very large; pit hook depression shallow (Fig. 68); lateral lobes medium and folded; stretcher and pit small (Fig. 69). Median part of scape long and narrow; genital pores situated at base of lateral lobes pockets (Fig. 70). Internal genitalia with a large, roughly oval ventral receptacula (Figs 69, 70). Other material examined: CANADA: Yukon Territory: km 155 Dempster Hwy., 28.vi–02.vii.1982, pan trap, 13, D.M. Wood (CNC). SWEDEN: Jamtland, Undersaker, 30.vi.1941, 131Ƥ, A. Holm (AMNH). USA: Alaska: North Slope Brgh., Meade River, 96km S Barrow, 11.vii.1978, 43, 15.vii.1978, 731Ƥ, B. Vogel (AMNH). Distribution: Holarctic (Northwest North America). Notes: This is the first time that A. decora has been recorded in North America. Both sexes of Old World and New World specimens have been studied and no major morphological differences have been found. MAP. 1. Localities of Agyneta decora (O. Pickard-Cambridge 1871), A. watertoni n. sp., A. aquila n. sp.

Published as part of Dupérré, Nadine, 2013, Taxonomic revision of the spider genera Agyneta and Tennesseellum (Araneae, Linyphiidae) of North America north of Mexico with a study of the embolic division within Micronetinae sensu Saaristo & Tanasevitch 1996, pp. 1-189 in Zootaxa 3674 (1) on pages 18-20, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3674.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283954

Keywords

Arthropoda, Agyneta decora, Linyphiidae, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Agyneta, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green