Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Trypostega striatula Smitt 1873

Authors: Judith L Winston;

Trypostega striatula Smitt 1873

Abstract

Trypostega striatula (Smitt, 1873) (Fig. 22; Table 21) Gemellipora glabra f. striatula Smitt, 1873: 37, pl. 11, fig. 207 (not figs 208–210). Lepralia inornata: Smitt 1873: 61, pl. 11, figs 215–216. Trypostega venusta: Osburn 1914: 198; 1940: 409; 1947: 28; Canu & Bassler 1920: 330, pl. 85, figs 15, 16; 1928a: 77, pl. 8, figs 15, 16; Marcus 1938: 35, pl. 8, fig. 19; Shier 1964: 627; Cook 1968: 184; 1985: 141; Lagaiij 1973: 147, pl. 2, fig. 10; Winston 1982: 151, fig. 86; 1984: 18, figs. 37, 38; Taylor & Foster 1994: 8, pl. 3, figs 1–4. Trypostega striatula: Winston 2005: 39, figs 101–103. Material examined. VMNH no. 70633, 70634; USNM no. 1283248. Description. Colonies encrusting, unilaminar, with flat, porcellanous gymnocystal frontal walls (Fig. 22 A). In SEM images faint wavy striations visible on frontal-wall surfaces. Autozooids rhomboidal, with shallow, regularly spaced pores, and small suborificial umbo (Fig. 22 B). Autozooid orifices cleithridiate, anter rounded, with sharp downward projecting condyles, and V-shaped sinus (Fig. 22 D). Colonies polymorphic; small heterozooids (zooeciules) with frontal-wall structure like that of autozooids found at distal ends of autozooids and may occur irregularly in other locations. Zooeciules with small elliptical orifice at raised distal end, slightly narrowed laterally, but without distinct condyles (Fig. 22 E, F) Ooecia large, flattened, embedded in frontal calcification, with numerous small, evenly spaced pores like those in autozooids, and with central longitudinal ridge (Fig. 22 E, F). Embryos reddish orange. Remarks. Trypostega striatula autozooids are more elongate with a slightly larger number of gymnocystal pores and slightly deeper, more curving V-shaped sinuses than the similar European T. venusta. The most significant morphological difference is in the shape of female zooidal orifices, which are similar to those of autozooids in T. striatula, but broader and shallower in T. venusta. Zooeciules are thought to be male zooids, but they may also be space-fillers, as they also occur patchily as space fillers on colony surfaces where there has been injury and regeneration. Those that appear in response to injury tend to be larger and more irregularly polygonal than those that develop in regular series. Distribution. Cape Hatteras to Brazil. Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico.

Published as part of Judith L Winston, 2016, Bryozoa of Floridan Oculina reefs, pp. 1-81 in Zootaxa 4071 (1) on page 42, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4071.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/260490

Keywords

Gymnolaemata, Trypostega, Animalia, Biodiversity, Trypostegidae, Bryozoa, Trypostega striatula, Taxonomy, Cheilostomatida

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2