Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Coleoxestia nitida Bates 1872

Authors: Galileo, Maria Helena M.; Santos-Silva, Antonio;

Coleoxestia nitida Bates 1872

Abstract

Coleoxestia nitida (Bates, 1872) (Figs. 13–14) Xestia nitida Bates, 1872: 172; Gemminger & Harold, 1872: 2807; Bates, 1880: 17. Coleoxestia nitida; Aurivillius, 1912: 65 (cat.); Blackwelder, 1946: 561 (checklist); Fragoso, 1982: 143 (distr.); Chemsak et al., 1992: 31 (checklist); Monné, 1993: 17 (cat.); Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 36 (checklist); Maes et al., 1994: 11 (distr.); Toledo et al., 2002: 525 (distr.); Turnbow et al., 2003: 6 (distr.); Monné, 2005: 63 (cat.); Eya & Chemsak, 2005a: 22; Martins & Monné, 2005: 166; Monné & Hovore, 2005: 39 (checklist); 2006: 38 (checklist); Hovore, 2006: 371 (distr.); Monné et al., 2010: 238 (distr.); Swift et al., 2010: 12 (distr.); Lagos & Barrios, 2014: 13 (distr.); Monné, 2016: 98 (cat.). Remarks. Bates (1872) described C. nitida from Nicaragua. Fragoso (1982) was the first who recorded this species in South America (Colombia). Monné & Giesbert (1994) reported the species from Mexico to Colombia. Martins & Monné (2005) recorded the species to southeast Brazil. Currently the species is recorded from Mexico (Oaxaca, Chiapas, Veracruz, Quintana Roo), Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil (Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná) (Monné 2016). We examined a male/female pair from Ecuador and a male from Bolivia (new country record). The couple from Ecuador has the prothorax with a very distinct spine laterally (Figs. 13–14). Notwithstanding, we think they do not belong to a different species, even having the scape more coarsely punctate than all specimens from Panama and southeast Brazil examined by us. The same variation (presence or absence of lateral spine at prothorax) was found in C. rufosemivittata (see above). Material examined (only Ecuador and Bolivia). ECUADOR, Manabi: Pedernales (00º05’02”N / 79º59’28”W), 1 male, 1 female, 02.II.2008, U. Roosileht col. (MZSP; EMNH). BOLIVIA, Santa Cruz: Hotel Flora & Fauna, 1 male, 14–20.XI.2008, Galileo, Vanin & Martins col. (MZSP).

Published as part of Galileo, Maria Helena M. & Santos-Silva, Antonio, 2016, New taxa, new records and notes on Coleoxestia Aurivillius, 1912 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae) in Zootaxa 4136 (1), DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4136.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/261919

Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Cerambycidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Coleoxestia, Coleoxestia nitida, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 5
  • 5
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
5
Green