Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.60563
Submodular-Selection-of-Assays (SSA) Please see the following manuscript for more details: Kai Wei * , Maxwell W. Libbrecht * , Jeffrey A Bilmes, William S. Noble. "Evaluation and selection of panels of genomics assays." Submitted. Get the most recent version on github: https://github.com/melodi-lab/Submodular-Selection-of-Assays Abstract: Due to the high cost of sequencing-based genomics assays such as ChIP-seq and DNase-seq, epigenomic characterization of a cell type is typically carried out using a small panel of assay types. Deciding a priori which assays to perform is thus a critical step in many studies. We present submodular selection of assays (SSA), a method for choosing a diverse panel of genomic assays that leverages methods from the field of submodular optimization. More generally, this application serves as a model for how submodular optimization can be applied to other discrete problems in biology.
submodular optimization, epigenomics, genomics, high-throughput sequencing, discrete optimization
submodular optimization, epigenomics, genomics, high-throughput sequencing, discrete optimization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts