Views provided by UsageCounts
Putaoa Hormiga and Tu, 2008 Type species: Putaoa huaping Hormiga and Tu, 2008 Revised Diagnosis. Males of Putaoa species differ from other pimoids in having distinctively large macrosetae on the pedipalpal tibia and/or cymbium (Figs. 2A, B, E, F) and by the absence of typical cuspules, such as those found in Pimoa (Hormiga 1994: figs. 68–70) and Weintrauboa (Hormiga 2003: figs. 5E, 6D). In addition, Putaoa species lack a median apophysis and have a relatively short and non-filiform embolus (Figs. 1B, 2D); the embolus is filiform in many Pimoa (Hormiga 1994: figs. 86, 102) and Weintrauboa species (Hormiga 2008: figs. 2, 3). In Putaoa the metatarsus I is unmodified, while sinuous in the males of most Weintrauboa species (Hormiga 2003: figs. 3G–J). Females are diagnosed by their relatively flat epigynum with lateral openings, relatively short copulatory ducts and medial fertilization ducts (the female of P. megacantha remains undescribed). Phylogenetics. Hormiga & Tu (2008) hypothesized that the monophyly of Putaoa is supported by four unambiguous synapomorphies: large and long macrosetae on cymbium and on male pedipalpal tibiae, absence of a median apophysis and a relatively short, non-filiform embolus. The new species of Putaoa shares all these apomorphies.
Published as part of Hormiga, Gustavo & Dimitrov, Dimitar, 2017, The discovery of the spider genus Putaoa (Araneae, Pimoidae) in Taiwan with the description of a new species, including its web architecture, pp. 97-104 in Zootaxa 4341 (1) on page 98, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4341.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/1038808
Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Pimoidae, Biodiversity, Putaoa, Taxonomy
Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Pimoidae, Biodiversity, Putaoa, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts