Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Short-read metagenomic assembly: finding the best fit in a world of options

Authors: Mendes, Catarina Inês; Vila-Cerqueira, Pedro; Motro, Yair; Moran-Gilad, Jacob; Carriço, João André; Ramirez, Mário;

Short-read metagenomic assembly: finding the best fit in a world of options

Abstract

Background Short-read shotgun metagenomics can offer comprehensive microbial detection and characterisation of complex clinical samples. The de novo assembly is a key process when analysing metagenomic data since it allows recovering draft genomes from a pool of mixed raw reads, yielding longer sequences that offer contextual information and afford a more complete picture of the microbial community than simply species composition. It also represents a major bottleneck in obtaining trustworthy, reproducible results. Materials/Methods We developed LMAS, an automated workflow enabling the benchmarking of traditional and metagenomic dedicated prokaryotic de novo assembly software using defined mock communities. LMAS was implemented in Nextflow using Docker containers to provide flexibility. The results are presented in an interactive HTML report where selected global and reference specific performance metrics can be explored. The mock communities can be provided by the user to better reflect the samples of interest. New assemblers can be added with minimal changes to the pipeline, so that LMAS can be expanded as novel algorithms are developed. Results The eight bacterial genomes and four plasmids of the ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standards were used as reference. Raw sequence data of the mock communities, with an even and logarithmic distribution of species, and a simulated sample of the evenly distributed reads generated from the genomes in the Zymobiomics standard were used as input for 11 de novo assemblers (Figure 1). The resulting LMAS report is available at https://lmas-demo.herokuapp.com. Conclusions Our results showed significant differences in breadth of coverage, and number and accuracy of the contigs generated by each de novo assembler. The performance of each assembler varied depending on the species of interest and its abundance in the sample, with less abundant species presenting a significant challenge for all assemblers. No sizable gains were obtained when using dedicated metagenomic assemblers and no assembler stood out as an undisputed all-purpose choice for short-read metagenomic prokaryote genome assembly, with different assemblers showing specific strengths. Efforts are needed to further improve metagenomic assembly performance and using LMAS could underpin this development process. The LMAS workflow and documentation is available at https://github.com/cimendes/LMAS.

Keywords

metagenomics, benchmark, quality assessment, workflow, bioinformatics, de novo assembly

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 2
  • 4
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
2
Green