Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff, 1942) Hart, 1962 1942b Entocythere (C.) copiosa sp. nov. —Hoff: 66, 69–71, 72, 73, Figs. 9–13 (D, H, K, R, T). 1942a E. copiosa Hoff 1942.—Hoff: 16, 166 (C). 1942a E. copiosa.— Rioja: 203 (A, H). 1942b Entocythere (Cytherites) copiosa Clayton Hoff 1942.—Rioja: 688, 689–690, 692, 695, 696, Fig. 3, expanded diagnosis, specifically additional information pertaining to the copulatory apparatus (K, R). 1943 Entocythere copiosa Hoff, 1942.—Hoff: 280, 281, 285, 286 (A, D, H). 1943a copiosa.— Rioja: 564 (R). 1943b Entocythere (Cytherites) copiosa.—Rioja: 569, 570, 571, 576, Fig. 18 (R, T). 1944a E. copiosa Hoff 1942.—Hoff: 330, 332, 356 (K, R). 1947 E. copiosa Hoff. —Tressler: 705 (C). 1949 Entocythere copiosa Hoff. — Rioja: 328 (R). 1959 Entocythere copiosa Hoff 1942.—Tressler: 731, Fig. 28.193a, b (D, H, K, T). 1959 E. copiosa Hoff (1942).—Crawford: 173 (C). 1962 Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff) new combination.—Hart: 122 [as E. copiosa], 126–127 (C, D, T). 1965 A. copiosa (Hoff, 1942).—Crawford: 149 (R). 1966a Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff, 1942).—Hart & Hart: 5 (A). 1966 A. copiosa (Hoff, 1942: 69).—Hobbs: 70, 72, 74, Plate II Fig. 10 (D, H, K, R). 1971 Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff).—Hart, D.G. & Hart: 116 (A). 1971 Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff, 1942:69).—Hobbs Jr.: 28, 29, 52 (C, K). 1971 Anklylocythere copiosa (Hoff, 1942).—Hobbs III: 139 (R). 1974 Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff, 1942). Hart & Hart: 14 [and as E. copiosa], 15 [as E. copiosa], 20, 23–24, 26, 177, 221, Pl. I Figs. 14–16, Pl. XLV (D, H, K, R, T). 1975 Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff, 1942).—Hart & Hart: 4 (C, D, H). 1978 A. copiosa (Hobbs).—Hobbs: 506, 511, erroneous authority (R). 1991 Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff).—Hobbs & Peters: 64, 69 (A, D, H). 2014a Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff, 1942).—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 947 (C). 2016 Ankylocythere copiosa (Hoff).—Shelton, Weaver & Williams: 529 (H). Remarks: Hoff (1942b: 69) designated a female as the holotype of E. copiosa (= A. copiosa) and a male as the allotype. This type designation is repeated for all species described in Hoff (1942b) and Hoff (1943); Hoff (1944a) reversed this practice, designating a male as the holotype and a female as the allotype.

Published as part of Williams, Bronwyn W. & Weaver, Patricia G., 2018, A historical review of the taxonomy and classification of Entocytheridae (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida), pp. 1-129 in Zootaxa 4448 (1) on pages 28-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4448.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1444492