Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Accurate species delimitation is paramount to studies of biodiversity and ecology. Lineage concepts applying coalescent approaches to species delimitation have become increasingly popular, yet have been questioned recently in their ultimate value, and for conflating species boundaries with population structure. The ‘Phenophyletic Species Concept’ explicitly considers both lineages and ecological ‘role’ shifts and provides an opportunity to incorporate ecologically meaningful data from multiple sources in studies of species boundaries. Here, the Phenophyletic Concept was applied to a problematic group of mycoheterotrophic orchids, the Corallorhiza striata complex, by analyzing genomic, morphological, phenological, reproductive-mode, niche, and fungal host data. Our recently developed method for generating genomic polymorphism data–ISSRseq–demonstrates strong evidence for four distinct lineages. There is evident divergence in morphology, phenology, reproductive mode, and fungal associates among the lineages; however, none of the datasets aside from genomic data fully satisfy the condition of a significant ‘role’ shift, which requires evidence of fixed differences in the ‘extended phenotype.’ The four principal lineages identified in the current study are thus recognized at the level of variety, short of comprising different species. This study represents the most comprehensive application of the Phenophyletic Species Concept to date, and illustrates the advantages of such an approach.
SNP data, Integrative species delimitation, mycoheterotroph, species concept, species boundaries, Orchidaceae, ISSRseq
SNP data, Integrative species delimitation, mycoheterotroph, species concept, species boundaries, Orchidaceae, ISSRseq
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 32 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts